2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-017-0300-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid method for the imputation of genomic data in livestock populations

Abstract: BackgroundThis paper describes a combined heuristic and hidden Markov model (HMM) method to accurately impute missing genotypes in livestock datasets. Genomic selection in breeding programs requires high-density genotyping of many individuals, making algorithms that economically generate this information crucial. There are two common classes of imputation methods, heuristic methods and probabilistic methods, the latter being largely based on hidden Markov models. Heuristic methods are robust, but fail to imput… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low‐coverage GBS data had many data points with no or few sequence reads. To increase the quantity and quality of this data, we used the modified Hidden Markov Model of Li et al (2010) as implemented in the AlphaImpute program version 1.3 (Hickey et al, 2012b; Antolin et al, 2017), available at http://www.alphagenes.roslin.ed.ac.uk/AlphaSuite/AlphaImpute. Each family and chromosome was imputed independently.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low‐coverage GBS data had many data points with no or few sequence reads. To increase the quantity and quality of this data, we used the modified Hidden Markov Model of Li et al (2010) as implemented in the AlphaImpute program version 1.3 (Hickey et al, 2012b; Antolin et al, 2017), available at http://www.alphagenes.roslin.ed.ac.uk/AlphaSuite/AlphaImpute. Each family and chromosome was imputed independently.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main motivation for this R-package was to provide a standardized and tested set of routines in R 28 for genotype imputation with AlphaImpute (Hickey et al 2011;Hickey, Kinghorn, et al 2012;29 4 / 33 Browning 2007), SHAPE-IT (Delaneau et al 2011), Impute2 (Howie et al 2009), MaCH (Li et al 52 2010), MERLIN (Abecasis et al 2002), cnF2freq (Nettelblad et al 2009), and AlphaImpute (Hickey 53 et al 2011;Hickey, Kinghorn, et al 2012; Antolín et al 2017). These rely on heuristic or 54 probabilistic models to infer the missing genotypes by identifying the most probable haplotype (i.e.…”
Section: Background 27mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper will however not 60 discuss the advantages and performances of the available imputation software packages, but refer to 61 e.g. Ma et al (2013) or Antolín et al (2017) for this. 62…”
Section: Background 27mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pedigree‐based methods make inferences between closely related individuals to identify shared haplotypes (Antolín et al . ) and thus provide an alternative source of information when the genotyped SNPs are not sufficiently informative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%