2021
DOI: 10.2113/2021/7673447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hybrid Model for Simulating Fracturing Fluid Flowback in Tight Sandstone Gas Wells considering a Three-Dimensional Discrete Fracture

Abstract: Two-phase (gas+water) flow is quite common in tight sandstone gas reservoirs during flowback and early-time production periods. However, many analytical models are restricted to single-phase flow problems and three-dimensional fracture characteristics are seldom considered. Numerical simulations are good choices for this problem, but it is time consuming in gridding and simulating. This paper presents a comprehensive hybrid model to characterize two-phase flow behaviour and predict the production performance o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where p is the formation pressure, MPa; p is the average formation pressure, MPa; m is the pseudo-pressure of the formation, MPa 2 /(mPa•s); µ g is the gas viscosity, mPa•s; Z is the deviation factor; t is the time, d; and t a is the pseudo-time, d. In this paper, the three-dimensional distribution of the hydraulic fracture is considered, and the flow inside the fracture is no longer limited to one-dimensional flow as assumed in the conventional model. The flow equation in a finite-conductivity fracture is as follows [28]:…”
Section: Fluid Flow In the Hydraulic Fracturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where p is the formation pressure, MPa; p is the average formation pressure, MPa; m is the pseudo-pressure of the formation, MPa 2 /(mPa•s); µ g is the gas viscosity, mPa•s; Z is the deviation factor; t is the time, d; and t a is the pseudo-time, d. In this paper, the three-dimensional distribution of the hydraulic fracture is considered, and the flow inside the fracture is no longer limited to one-dimensional flow as assumed in the conventional model. The flow equation in a finite-conductivity fracture is as follows [28]:…”
Section: Fluid Flow In the Hydraulic Fracturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Equation (55), the pressure response of all fracture panels can be obtained and written in the following matrix forms: With the superposition principle, for the system in Figure 3, the pressure drop at the point (x D , y D , z D ) caused by all fracture panels can be calculated, and the equation is given by the following [28]:…”
Section: 2 Solution Of the Numerical Fracture Flow Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Process in which the two-phase flow characteristics of 3D discrete fractures cannot be calculated accurately. 17 Elputranto (2020) used the latest geomechanical nonisothermal multicomponent two-phase flow equations to simulate formation injuries during fracturing and solved the multiphysics/chemistry problem of formation injuries in the vicinity of the fracture-matrix interface. 18 However, most of the existing results are single-factor analyses, focusing on the combined flow of multiple seepage mechanisms of shale gas in the reservoir matrix and lacking the relational description of the self-absorption process and ion diffusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang (2021) integrated the finite difference method and the principle of three-dimensional volumetric source function and superposition to solve the problem of three-dimensional discrete fracturing during the fracturing process. Process in which the two-phase flow characteristics of 3D discrete fractures cannot be calculated accurately . Elputranto (2020) used the latest geomechanical nonisothermal multicomponent two-phase flow equations to simulate formation injuries during fracturing and solved the multiphysics/chemistry problem of formation injuries in the vicinity of the fracture-matrix interface …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%