2020
DOI: 10.1002/oca.2591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid modified grey wolf optimization‐sine cosine algorithm‐based power system stabilizer parameter tuning in a multimachine power system

Abstract: SummaryDamping of low‐frequency oscillations due to the unpredictable perturbations of a power network has always been a challenging task. In an interconnected power network, power system stabilizers (PSSs) are in practice to damp out these low‐frequency oscillations by providing a necessary control signal to the automatic voltage regulator unit based on the deviation in generator speed/power output. This article proposes a novel approach of hybrid modified grey wolf optimization‐sine cosine algorithm for tuni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SC-GWO was also used to determine the optimal setting for over-current relays. Another similar work was done by Devarapalli and Bhattacharyya (2020), in which MGWO-SCA was proposed for tuning the power system stabilizer parameters of an interconnected multi-machine power system. The effectiveness of MGWO-SCA was evaluated based on benchmark model of two area four generator multi-machine system.…”
Section: Hybridization With Grey Wolf Optimizermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…SC-GWO was also used to determine the optimal setting for over-current relays. Another similar work was done by Devarapalli and Bhattacharyya (2020), in which MGWO-SCA was proposed for tuning the power system stabilizer parameters of an interconnected multi-machine power system. The effectiveness of MGWO-SCA was evaluated based on benchmark model of two area four generator multi-machine system.…”
Section: Hybridization With Grey Wolf Optimizermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…where s = No. of system state variables, limiting values of decrement ratio (σ 0 ) and damping factor (ξ 0 ) are considered as -3 and 0.3, respectively [38]. The common features of (13), and ( 14) can be achieved with the objective function framed as given in (15).…”
Section: Objective Function and Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practically, damping ratios more than 0.3 and eigenvalues left side of -3 are reasonable values to damp out the low-frequency oscillations. As the second term in the equation 21 is much lesser compared to the first term, the weightage factor α is chosen as 1000 [9].…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%