“…In the case of D = 10, the DMDS-HS algorithm is significantly superior to HS, IHS, GHS, SGHS, NGHS, IGHS, LHS, IMGHS, and IDHS-LDD algorithms in 29, 24, 28, 28, 29, 29, 27, 30, and 13 of the 30 functions, respectively. Similarly, when D = 30, the DMDS-HS algorithm outperforms the HS, IHS, GHS, SGHS, NGHS, IGHS, LHS, IMGHS, and ID-HS-LDD algorithms in 28,27,29,30,29,30,23,26, and 20 of the 30 functions, respectively. And in the highdimensional case (D = 50), the DMDS-HS algorithm also performs well.…”