2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/qomex.2018.8463405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hybrid Quality Metric for Non-Integer Image Interpolation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use two quality assessment metrics for image super-resolution, Energy Similarity (ES) [31] and Frequency Similarity (FS) [32], to measure the similarity between integer-and non-integer-scaling low-resolution images. ES can measure global visual information degradations between two patches.…”
Section: Optimal Integer Scaling-factor Selection Based On Similaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use two quality assessment metrics for image super-resolution, Energy Similarity (ES) [31] and Frequency Similarity (FS) [32], to measure the similarity between integer-and non-integer-scaling low-resolution images. ES can measure global visual information degradations between two patches.…”
Section: Optimal Integer Scaling-factor Selection Based On Similaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A smaller value of ES indicates better performance. According to [32], FS is computed in the Fourier domain as follows,…”
Section: Optimal Integer Scaling-factor Selection Based On Similaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou et al proposed a Quality Assessment Database for Super-resolved images (QADS) and an IQA method considering the structural and textural components of images [20]. Chen et al presented a hybrid quality metric for non-integer image interpolation that combined both reduced-reference and no-reference philosophies [14]. Fang et al introduced a reduced-reference quality assessment method for image SR by predicting the energy and texture similarity between LR and HR images [16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance evaluation results of the proposed DISQ model are listed in Table V and compared with other IQA methods, where the best and second-best results are shown in red and blue, respectively. The compared algorithms include four no-reference IQA methods (DIIVIVE [30], BRISQUE [31], HOSA [32], CNN-IQA [11]) designed for general distorted images, six no-reference ISA indicators (LPC-SI [36], MLV [37], GPC [38], SPARISH [39], Synthetic-MaxPol [40], HVS-MaxPol [35]), two focus quality assessment algorithms (FQPath [49], FocusLiteNN [50]), and four related SR-IQA works (NSS-SR [15], HYQM [14], LNQM [9], BSRIQA [45]).…”
Section: B Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation