2020
DOI: 10.1002/num.22472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid radial basis functions collocation technique to numerically solve fractional advection–diffusion models

Abstract: In this work, we propose a hybrid radial basis functions (RBFs) collocation technique for the numerical solution of fractional advection-diffusion models. In the formulation of hybrid RBFs (HRBFs), there exist shape parameter (c*) and weight parameter () that control numerical accuracy and stability. For these parameters, an adaptive algorithm is developed and validated. The proposed HRBFs method is tested for numerical solutions of some fractional Black-Sholes and diffusion models. Numerical simulations perfo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meshless methods can be broadly separated into two groups, namely, meshless methods based on strong form such as Kansa's-radial basis function (RBF) and collocation methods (Dehghan and Shokri, 2007;Hu et al, 2005;Jankowska et al, 2018;Kansa, 1990;Hussain and Haq, 2020;Lin et al, 2017;Singh et al, 2019;Xiong et al, 2018), smoothed particle hydrodynamics method (Liu et al, 2004) and finite point collocation method (Onate et al, 1996) and meshless methods based on weak form such as element-free Galerkin method (Belytschko et al, 1994), direct meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method (Ilati and Dehghan, 2017) and local radial point interpolation (MLRPI) method (Shivanian and Jafarabadi, 2018;Shivanian, 2015;Shivanian, 2016). In the methods of first group, by using collocation approach, governing equations and boundary conditions are discretized at the set of scattered nodes to get an algebraic system of equations.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meshless methods can be broadly separated into two groups, namely, meshless methods based on strong form such as Kansa's-radial basis function (RBF) and collocation methods (Dehghan and Shokri, 2007;Hu et al, 2005;Jankowska et al, 2018;Kansa, 1990;Hussain and Haq, 2020;Lin et al, 2017;Singh et al, 2019;Xiong et al, 2018), smoothed particle hydrodynamics method (Liu et al, 2004) and finite point collocation method (Onate et al, 1996) and meshless methods based on weak form such as element-free Galerkin method (Belytschko et al, 1994), direct meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method (Ilati and Dehghan, 2017) and local radial point interpolation (MLRPI) method (Shivanian and Jafarabadi, 2018;Shivanian, 2015;Shivanian, 2016). In the methods of first group, by using collocation approach, governing equations and boundary conditions are discretized at the set of scattered nodes to get an algebraic system of equations.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Form A (0) and b (0) using Equations ( 32) and (35), respectively. Solve the linear system (31) for k = 0 to obtain u (1) .…”
Section: Discrete Linear Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite point method (FPM) [32] is a well-known meshless method especially in the field of fluid dynamics. Based on the MLS approximation [23,24,33] and the point collocation technique [34][35][36], the FPM possesses some outstanding merits such as truly meshless, no numerical quadrature, easy to implement, generating sparse and banded discrete systems, and the extensible to high dimensional problems. Theoretical error estimations for the FPM have been established in References [37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%