A hybrid solution for extracting structured medical information from unstructured data in medical records via a double-reading/entry system

Abstract

BackgroundHealthcare providers generate a huge amount of biomedical data stored in either legacy system (paper-based) format or electronic medical records (EMR) around the world, which are collectively referred to as big biomedical data (BBD). To realize the promise of BBD for clinical use and research, it is an essential step to extract key data elements from unstructured medical records into patient-centered electronic health records with computable data elements. Our objective is to introduce a novel solution, known as a double-reading/entry system (DRESS), for extracting clinical data from unstructured medical records (MR) and creating a semi-structured electronic health record database, as well as to demonstrate its reproducibility empirically.MethodsUtilizing the modern cloud-based technologies, we have developed a comprehensive system that includes multiple subsystems, from capturing MRs in clinics, to securely transferring MRs, storing and managing cloud-based MRs, to facilitating both machine learning and manual reading, and to performing iterative quality control before committing the semi-structured data into the desired database. To evaluate the reproducibility of extracted medical data elements by DRESS, we conduct a blinded reproducibility study, with 100 MRs from patients who have undergone surgical treatment of lung cancer in China. The study uses Kappa statistic to measure concordance of discrete variables, and uses correlation coefficient to measure reproducibility of continuous variables.ResultsUsing the DRESS, we have demonstrated the feasibility of extracting clinical data from unstructured MRs to create semi-structured and patient-centered electronic health record database. The reproducibility study with 100 patient’s MRs has shown an overall high reproducibility of 98 %, and varies across six modules (pathology, Radio/chemo therapy, clinical examination, surgery information, medical image and general patient information).ConclusionsDRESS uses a double-reading, double-entry, and an independent adjudication, to manually curate structured data elements from unstructured clinical data. Further, through distributed computing strategies, DRESS protects data privacy by dividing MR data into de-identified modules. Finally, through internet-based computing cloud, DRESS enables many data specialists to work in a virtual environment to achieve the necessary scale of processing thousands MRs within days. This hybrid system represents probably a workable solution to solve the big medical data challenge.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0357-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Circulating anti‐p16a IgG autoantibodies as a potential prognostic biomarker for non‐small cell lung cancer

“…The in-house ELISA showed a good reproducibility with a CV of 9.8% for the anti-p16a IgG assay, 14.4% for the anti-p16b IgG assay and 11.2% for the anti-p16c IgG assay.…”

Infrastructure of the Electronic Health Record Data Management for Digital Patient Phenotype Creating

“…The design and implementation of the PPD layer requires certainty when choosing a relational or not only a relational (Not only SQL, NoSQL) nature of relations between entities. The features of digitized data presented in EHR, namely, their heterogeneity, poor structuring (the presence of various tables and non-patterned texts in natural language) and, finally, significant amounts, suggest large biomedical data (BBMD, Big Biomedical Data [12]). Based on the results of research carried out by A.B.M.…”

“…In addition, J. Luo, M. Wu, et al in their review [11] draw attention to the fact that the application of artificial intelligence technologies and Big Data to solve health problems based on EHC has its own specifics and differs from such areas biomedical informatics, as computer modeling of organs, image processing and analysis, genome research. In this context, the researchers such as L. Luo, L. Li, J. Hu, et al [12]; K. Kreimeyer, M. Foster, A. Pandey, et al [13]; A. Névéol, H. Dalianis, S. Velupillai, et al [14] highlight the problem of extracting objective information from medical texts included in EHR. They note the objectivity of the fact that there are many natural language processing systems (NLP) for English medical texts processing.…”

To understand a journal through four features: An example of Journal of Integrative Cardiology

“…We have seen some computer scientists placing high hope on those machine-learning algorithms, data mining or artificial intelligence(AI) to quantify research information [14,15] for use in academics. Accordingly, it is possible for us to apply those data and related techniques to understand the features of a specific journal.…”