2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa23c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hybrid Supervised/Unsupervised Machine Learning Approach to Solar Flare Prediction

Abstract: We introduce a hybrid approach to solar flare prediction, whereby a supervised regularization method is used to realize feature importance and an unsupervised clustering method is used to realize the binary flare/no-flare decision. The approach is validated against NOAA SWPC data.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning is a subfield of artificial intelligence, which grants computers abilities to learn from the past data and make predictions on unseen future data (Alpaydin 2009). Commonly used machine learning methods for flare prediction include decision trees (Yu et al 2009(Yu et al , 2010, random forests (Barnes et al 2016;Liu et al 2017;Florios et al 2018;Breiman 2001), k-nearest neighbors Huang et al 2013;Winter & Balasubramaniam 2015;Nishizuka et al 2017), support vector machines (Qahwaji & Colak 2007;Yuan et al 2010;Bobra & Couvidat 2015;Boucheron et al 2015;Muranushi et al 2015;Florios et al 2018), ordinal logistic regression (Song et al 2009), the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) (Benvenuto et al 2018;Jonas et al 2018), extremely randomized trees (Nishizuka et al 2017), and neural networks (Qahwaji & Colak 2007;Wang et al 2008;Colak & Qahwaji 2009;Higgins et al 2011;Ahmed et al 2013). Recently, Nishizuka et al (2018) adopted a deep neural network, named Deep Flare Net, for flare prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning is a subfield of artificial intelligence, which grants computers abilities to learn from the past data and make predictions on unseen future data (Alpaydin 2009). Commonly used machine learning methods for flare prediction include decision trees (Yu et al 2009(Yu et al , 2010, random forests (Barnes et al 2016;Liu et al 2017;Florios et al 2018;Breiman 2001), k-nearest neighbors Huang et al 2013;Winter & Balasubramaniam 2015;Nishizuka et al 2017), support vector machines (Qahwaji & Colak 2007;Yuan et al 2010;Bobra & Couvidat 2015;Boucheron et al 2015;Muranushi et al 2015;Florios et al 2018), ordinal logistic regression (Song et al 2009), the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) (Benvenuto et al 2018;Jonas et al 2018), extremely randomized trees (Nishizuka et al 2017), and neural networks (Qahwaji & Colak 2007;Wang et al 2008;Colak & Qahwaji 2009;Higgins et al 2011;Ahmed et al 2013). Recently, Nishizuka et al (2018) adopted a deep neural network, named Deep Flare Net, for flare prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nishizuka et al (2017) and Jonas et al (2018) include Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) Atmospheric Imaging Assembly and EUV image characteristics in addition to magnetogram data in a fully connected neural network architecture. Benvenuto et al (2018) use Fuzzy C-Means-an unsupervised machine learning method-in combination with some of the mentioned supervised methods for solar flare prediction. Approaches such as Guerra et al (2018) and Kontogiannis et al (2018), while not machine-learning approaches themselves, provide statistical tools for evaluating the engineered features in terms of their potential advantage in machine learning models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With quickly increasing interest in and success of pilot studies in the solar-physics community, machinelearning technology has opened a new window into the space weather forecast. Various models have been investigated and developed (e.g., Ahmed et al 2013;Bobra & Couvidat 2015;Liu et al 2017aLiu et al , 2019Nishizuka et al 2017Nishizuka et al , 2018Benvenuto et al 2018;Florios et al 2018;Huang et al 2018;Jonas et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%