2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12652-021-03541-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid tiny YOLO v4-SPP module based improved face mask detection vision system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Something else to note is that there have been various other papers that aimed at improving the overall architecture of YOLOv4 itself, with various different approaches [15,18,21,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Something else to note is that there have been various other papers that aimed at improving the overall architecture of YOLOv4 itself, with various different approaches [15,18,21,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to the region proposal, the detections tend to be sparse, and the algorithm can identify the objects better. On the other hand, if frequent detections are necessary, then a single-stage detector [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] is better since the two-stage ones tend to be rather slow. They sacrifice accuracy for detection frequency by skipping the region proposal stage and detecting the objects directly on the feature maps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tiny YOLO v4 algorithm in recent times has shown fascinating results in general object category detection on the MS COCO dataset [26] . Few researchers by proposing new variants of tiny YOLO v4 for face mask detection have scaled up the performance in terms of speed and detection [27] . However, the issue of inaccurate detection in distant images and the ability to detect small objects still surface in the published work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the mean average precision (mAP) of YOLO-V4 Tiny (mAP 22%) was inferior to YOLO-V4 (mAP 43.5%) on the MS COCO dataset, although it was faster than YOLO-V4 in detection speed (27). The YOLO-V4 Tiny had been shown in practice to be better at detecting independent objects, but struggled with detecting small objects and overlapping targets (28). For identification of CACs, high accuracy and quick response are both required clinically.…”
Section: Replacing the Backbonementioning
confidence: 99%