“…As shown in Figure 3e and Figure 3f, the hierarchy of adsorption selectivity did not change when the C 2 H 2 molar ratio in gas mixtures changed from 0.1 to 0.9. It is noteworthy that among the three MOF compounds, ZJNU‐96 showed the highest C 2 H 2 /CH 4 and C 2 H 2 /CO 2 adsorption selectivities at 298 K and 1 atm, which is comparable to that of its parent MOF NOTT‐101 (C 2 H 2 /CH 4 : 26.7), [16] but higher than those of some other reported MOFs such as BUT‐70B (C 2 H 2 /CH 4 : 23.3), [41] PCM‐48 (C 2 H 2 /CH 4 : 23.3), [42] UTSA‐222 (C 2 H 2 /CH 4 : 19), [43] FJU‐36 (C 2 H 2 /CH 4 : 17.7), [44] UPC‐33 (C 2 H 2 /CH 4 : 7.78), [45] ZJNU‐15 (C 2 H 2 /CO 2 : 4.4), [11b] Cu(BDC‐Br) (C 2 H 2 /CO 2 : 3.9), [46] NTU‐9 (C 2 H 2 /CO 2 : 3.5), [47] BSF‐1 (C 2 H 2 /CO 2 : 3.3), [48] ZJNU‐14 (C 2 H 2 /CO 2 : 3.42), [17b] UTSA‐68 (C 2 H 2 /CO 2 : 3.4), [49] Zn 3 (ALP)(TDC) 2.5 (C 2 H 2 /CO 2 : 2.8), [50] and Co(btzip)(H 2 btzip) (C 2 H 2 /CO 2 : 2.5) [51] at the same conditions. In particular, the C 2 H 2 /CH 4 and C 2 H 2 /CO 2 adsorption selectivity of the ortho ‐dimethyl‐functionalized MOF ZJNU‐96 is 8.6 % and 8.3 % higher than the meta ‐dimethyl‐decorated counterpart ZJNU‐95 .…”