Gaps often occur in eddy covariance flux measurements, leading to data loss and necessitating accurate gap-filling. Furthermore, gaps in evapotranspiration (ET) measurements of annual field crops are particularly challenging to fill because crops undergo rapid change over a short season. In this study, an innovative deep learning (DL) gap-filling method was tested on a database comprising six datasets from different crops (cotton, tomato, and wheat). For various gap scenarios, the performance of the method was compared with the common gap-filling technique, marginal distribution sampling (MDS), which is based on lookup tables. Furthermore, a predictor importance analysis was performed to evaluate the importance of the different meteorological inputs in estimating ET. On the half-hourly time scale, the deep learning method showed a significant 13.5% decrease in nRMSE (normalized root mean square error) throughout all datasets and gap durations. A substantially smaller standard deviation of mean nRMSE, compared with marginal distribution sampling, was also observed. On the whole-gap time scale (half a day to six days), average nMBE (normalized mean bias error) was similar to that of MDS, whereas standard deviation was improved. Using only air temperature and relative humidity as input variables provided an RMSE that was significantly smaller than that resulting from the MDS method. These results suggest that the deep learning method developed here is reliable and more consistent than the standard gap-filling method and thereby demonstrates the potential of advanced deep learning techniques for improving dynamic time series modeling.