A cluster analysis of the relationship between sucking habits, consistency of food ingested, and taste sensitivity in children

Abstract

As sucking habits and eating behavior may be interrelated and also associated with taste, body composition, and sociodemographic factors, the objective was to perform an exploratory analysis to identify groups of children with a high degree of association between intragroup subjects, providing explanation and interpretation of the data. The study initially included 352 prepubertal children (197 girls; 7‐ to 11‐year‐old), from whom information about sociodemographic characteristics, duration of breastfeeding, past bottle‐feeding and non‐nutritive sucking habits, taste sensitivity, body mass index (BMI), and consistency of food ingested were collected. Salivary concentrations of amylase and total protein were also determined. Data were submitted to cluster analysis (hierarchical analysis, K‐means, and silhouette plot), one‐way ANOVA and correlation tests. Cluster analysis included 159 children, generating three reliable and meaningful clusters: Cluster 1 (labeled “good tasters”), was characterized by older children and higher taste sensitivity; Cluster 2 (“softer food consistency”) by longer bottle‐feeding duration and children who eat food with lower consistency, and Cluster 3 (“breastfed”) by longer breastfeeding duration (silhouette coefficient = 0.61). Cluster 3 also showed the higher percentage of normal‐weight children, normal delivery, maternal schooling, and lower rate of past non‐nutritional sucking habit. No correlation was found between salivary amylase and total protein concentrations, taste sensitivity and BMI, although taste sensitivity showed to be higher among girls (p = 0.002; power = 88%). The study identified three clusters, highlighting the relationship between nutritional sucking habits, consistency of food ingested, and sociodemographic characteristics. Most importantly, a close relation between bottle‐feeding and consumption of soft food consistency was observed.

Salivary Microbiological and Gingival Health Status Evaluation of Adolescents With Overweight and Obesity: A Cluster Analysis

“…Data were also submitted to cluster analysis to identify homogenous groups of adolescents according to body fat accumulation. First, hierarchical cluster analysis using the farthest neighbor method for calculating distances between clusters was performed to obtain the dendrogram and analyze the range of clusters for further running K-means ( 37 ). K-means analysis was performed to identify homogenous groups of adolescents, according to %BF, %S.…”

Relationship between polypharmacy, xerostomia, gustatory sensitivity, and swallowing complaints in the elderly: A multidisciplinary approach

“…The evaluation of gustatory sensitivity was performed as previously described (Marquezin et al, 2019). Briefly, the method consists of four liquid solutions in four different concentrations related to primary tastes: salty (NaCl 0.25, 0.1, 0.04, 0.016 g/ml); sweet (sucrose 0.4, 0.2, 0.1, 0.05 g/ml); sour (citric acid 0.075, 0.041, 0.0225, 0.0125 g/ml); bitter (quinine hydrochloride 0.0015, 0.0006, 0.0002, 0.0001 g/ml).…”

Oral Health and Nutritional Characteristics of Adults With Morbid Obesity: A Multivariate Analysis

“…The evaluation of taste sensitivity was conducted using an adaptation of a validated methodology (22), called three-dropmethod which uses four concentrations of each basic tastes (salty, sweet, sour, and bitter). In the present study, only the lowest concentration of each stimuli was used: salty-sodium chloride (0.016 g/mL), sweet-sucrose (0.05 g/mL), acid-citric acid (0.0125 g/mL), bitter-quinine hydrochloride (0.0001 g/mL), which were administered in a dropper (three drops) on the back of the tongue, with 1 drop of the tastant solution and 2 drops of distilled water, in order to verify the sensitivity to the lower concentrated tastants, which is near to the limit threshold.…”