A influência das percepções de benefícios, resultados e dificuldades dos grupos de pesquisa sobre as interações com empresas

Araújo, Veneziano; Mascarini, Suelene; Santos, Emerson Gomes dos; Costa, Ariana Ribeiro

doi:10.20396/rbi.v14i1.8649090

Cited by 7 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…RG are responsible for promoting relations between education, research and extension (Backes, Prado, Lino, Ferraz, Reibnitz, & Canever, 2012;Riquelme & Langer, 2010), considering the needs of funding agencies (Pereira & Andrade, 2008) and the practical use of theoretical knowledge (Araujo, Mascarini, Santos, & Costa, 2015;Caliari, Santos, & Mendes, 2016;Ramos-Vielba, Sánchez-Barrioluengo, & Woolley, 2016;Riquelme & Langer, 2010).…”

Section: Results In Research Groupsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition to the aforementioned interface between education, research and extension, the main objectives assigned to RG include creating and developing scientific knowledge (Erdmann & Lanzoni, 2008;Araujo et al, 2015). Other activities, related to extension (consultancy, partnerships with business companies and government etc.)…”

Section: Results In Research Groupsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, there are other results in RG. Araujo et al (2015) studied the influence of results perception, benefits and struggles in interactions between RG and companies. They affirm that it is normal for benefits and results to be equally considered, since both have similar elements, but emphasise that there may be differences between these dimensions related to their range: benefits may exist even with flawed results (e.g.…”

Section: Results In Research Groupsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, results were grouped into three dimensions, two of them more directed to academic purposes, better evaluated by RG (knowledge and academic results) and innovative results. Knowledge results include new scientific findings and new research projects; academic results are related to the formation of HR and students' theses, dissertations and publications, and software; and innovative results (focused on industrial purposes) are related to new products and artefacts, new industrial processes, improvement in industrial products, improvement in industrial processes, patents, design and creation of new companies (spin-offs) (Araujo et al, 2015). Caliari et al (2016) detailed some objectives that motivate relations between RG/universities and companies: accomplishment of scientific research, development of engineering activities (prototypes, equipment); software development; technology transfer; consultancy activities; supply of material inputs and staff training.…”

Section: Results In Research Groupsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The second factor, Proximal Research Results, assembles aspects inherent in RG, their raison d'être, such as advances in knowledge and diagnoses in research fields (Araujo et al, 2015); publications in scientific events and journals (Araujo et al, 2015;Caliari et al, 2016;Restrepo & Villegas, 2007;Viotti, 2003); development of social and technical competencies (Odelius & Sena, 2009;Fernandez & Odelius, 2013;Odelius et al, 2016); and completion of monographs, dissertations, theses or other academic works with the support of RG (Araujo et al, 2015;Restrepo & Villegas, 2007). .844…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Scale of Results in Research Groups

Freitas

Odelius

2017

RAM, Rev. Adm. Mackenzie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este artigo pode ser copiado, distribuído, exibido, transmitido ou adaptado desde que citados, de forma clara e explícita, o nome da revista, a edição, o ano e as páginas nas quais o artigo foi publicado originalmente, mas sem sugerir que a RAM endosse a reutilização do artigo. Esse termo de licenciamento deve ser explicitado para os casos de reutilização ou distribuição para terceiros. Não é permitido o uso para fins comerciais. PABLO FERNANDO PESSOA DE FREITASUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília -DF, Brazil. CATARINA CECÍLIA ODELIUSUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília -DF, Brazil.To cite this paper: Freitas, P. ABSTRACTPurpose: The aim of this paper is to develop a scale to measure results in research groups (RG). Originality/value: The study is innovative in developing a scale for verifying results in Brazilian RG. Its main contribution is data collection from an evaluation made by leaders regarding results that RG' produced as a whole (meso or organizational level), going further than individual indices of academic productivity. Design/methodology/approach: The scale was developed based on: 1) literature review of empirical papers published between 2005 and 2015 regarding results in RG; and 2) analysis of data (audio recordings, interview transcriptions, field reports) previously collected from RG members, regarding achieved results and re-evaluation of preliminary instruments developed by RG. In total, 387 RG leaders answered the survey after semantic and theoretical analysis by experts and a pre-test.

show abstract

Section: Results In Research Groupsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Results In Research Groupsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Results In Research Groupsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Results In Research Groupsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Scale of Results in Research Groups

Freitas

Odelius

2017

RAM, Rev. Adm. Mackenzie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Innovative performance of Brazilian public higher educational institutions

Souza

Antunes

Azevedo

et al. 2019

INMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the compensation between research groups and companies that contribute the most for the innovative performance of Brazilian public higher educational institutions (PHEI), using as database the 2010’s tabular plan from CNPq’s Directory of Research Groups. Design/methodology/approach Descriptive and multivariate statistical techniques such as spearman correlation, cluster analysis, ANOVA and discriminant analysis were used. Findings Compensations that contribute the most for the updating of the PHEI are identified as transfer of financial resources from the partner to the group; providing grants for the group; transfer of material supplies to partner’s activities; temporary physical transfer of human resources from the group to the activities conducted by the partner; other forms of compensation that do not fit in the previous categories; and partnering with transfers of resources of any kind going in any direction. Research limitations/implications As a limitation, it is pointed out the discontinuity of the tabular plan, which presents 2010 as the last available data. Practical implications The results can contribute to programs and policies to encourage innovation within universities. Originality/value It may be inferred that the stimulus to specific compensations may expand the quantitative idea of interaction points between the university and companies, linking qualitative aspects, which leads to an understanding that such interactions may, in fact, contribute directly to the activity of generating and spreading knowledge and innovation.

show abstract

Managerial Competencies and Results in Research Groups

Freitas

Odelius

2018

RAM, Rev. Adm. Mackenzie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The aim of this paper is to identify relationships between “managerial competencies” (MCs) and the resulting extension in Brazilian “research groups” (RGs), as well as differences resulting from sociodemographic/functional characteristics. Originality/value: Just like general organizations, RGs need to invest in aspects that enhance their results, taking more strategic approaches to efficiently gather and manage resources and establish networks and partnerships, features that are influenced by the leader’s competencies, which are not always satisfactorily displayed. In addition, the study is innovative in applying a scale of results in RGs (for the first time), identifying their relationships with MCs. Design/methodology/approach: We employed the Correlation Analysis (Kendall-Tau) and Difference tests between medians (Mann-Whitney and Kruskall-Wallis) from the questionnaires electronically completed by 387 RG leaders who accepted the invitation that was sent to 6,723 researchers. Findings: The study was based on scales with validity evidence, and its findings indicate that to achieve better results, it is not enough for the RGs leaders to control the management of people and research results; they also need to dedicate themselves to gathering resources and people because these MCs are more related to results in RGs. We also identified differences resulting from educational level, gender, scholarship grants, knowledge area, and/or research experience and group relation time.

show abstract

A influência das percepções de benefícios, resultados e dificuldades dos grupos de pesquisa sobre as interações com empresas

Cited by 7 publications

References 38 publications

Scale of Results in Research Groups

Scale of Results in Research Groups

Innovative performance of Brazilian public higher educational institutions

Managerial Competencies and Results in Research Groups

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About