O Programa Minha Casa Minha Vida: Habitação E Produção Do Espaço Urbano Em Diferentes Escalas E Perspectivas 2020
DOI: 10.7476/9786500030297.0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A inserção urbana de empreendimentos do Programa Minha Casa Minha Vida em João Pessoa, Campina Grande e Patos, na Paraíba

Abstract: All the contents of this work, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Todo o conteúdo deste trabalho, exceto quando houver ressalva, é publicado sob a licença Creative Commons Atribição 4.0. Todo el contenido de esta obra, excepto donde se indique lo contrario, está bajo licencia de la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimento 4.0.A inserção urbana de empreendimentos do Programa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stakeholders from different spheres of government are more interested in a higher number of units built than higher quality in design. This appears in all publicity, and even official program websites state that priority will be given to proposals that reach a higher number of families [38]. Therefore, the companies still would not be motivated to mass customize, even if the added effort and cost were only marginally higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stakeholders from different spheres of government are more interested in a higher number of units built than higher quality in design. This appears in all publicity, and even official program websites state that priority will be given to proposals that reach a higher number of families [38]. Therefore, the companies still would not be motivated to mass customize, even if the added effort and cost were only marginally higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%