2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A job task analysis to quantify the physical demands of load carriage duties conducted by ground close combat roles in the UK Armed Forces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, this pre-/post-load carriage methodology solely provides cognitive performance information at the instance of testing, and not during the load carriage tasks itself. This information during a load carriage task is of particular interest given that such tasks are often protracted in nature (e.g., 30 min to 18 h; Vine et al, 2017 ). The importance of within task assessment is evidenced by a number of studies.…”
Section: Inclusion Of Dual-/multi-taskingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, this pre-/post-load carriage methodology solely provides cognitive performance information at the instance of testing, and not during the load carriage tasks itself. This information during a load carriage task is of particular interest given that such tasks are often protracted in nature (e.g., 30 min to 18 h; Vine et al, 2017 ). The importance of within task assessment is evidenced by a number of studies.…”
Section: Inclusion Of Dual-/multi-taskingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The speeds were representative of a patrol (2.5 km . h -1 ), forced march (4.8 km.h -1 ), and insertion march (5.5 km.h -1 ) as observed in infantry soldiers(33). All bouts were completed on a levelgrass surface and paced by a Physical Training Instructor using a handheld Global Positioning System (Garmin eTrex 10, Garmin [Europe] Ltd, UK), with each bout separated by a minimum of 10 minutes' rest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%