2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.theochem.2008.09.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A joint experimental and theoretical study of kinetic and mechanism of rearrangement of allyl p-tolyl ether

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculations using the polarizable continuum model (PCM) failed to predict the correct order of reaction rates for the allyl p-tolyl ether rearrangement in solution. 81 Substituent effects on the Claisen rearrangement were also studied by the inclusion of R = Br, CH 3 , and OCH 3 groups in the allyl p-R-phenyl ether (Scheme 5(a)); the relative energies were in excellent agreement with experiment, e.g., the computed G ‡ values of 0.4, 0.0, and −1.1 kcal/mol compared with the reported values of 0.5, 0.0, and −0.9 kcal/mol for the Br, CH 3 , and OCH 3 reactions in water, 82 respectively. Calculation of a second Claisen rearrangement featuring allyl naphthyl ether (Scheme 5(b)) in five solvents: water, methanol, acetonitrile, DMF, and toluene, which were consistent with the qualitative representation of the rates and yields given by Sharpless and coworkers.…”
Section: Pericyclic Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculations using the polarizable continuum model (PCM) failed to predict the correct order of reaction rates for the allyl p-tolyl ether rearrangement in solution. 81 Substituent effects on the Claisen rearrangement were also studied by the inclusion of R = Br, CH 3 , and OCH 3 groups in the allyl p-R-phenyl ether (Scheme 5(a)); the relative energies were in excellent agreement with experiment, e.g., the computed G ‡ values of 0.4, 0.0, and −1.1 kcal/mol compared with the reported values of 0.5, 0.0, and −0.9 kcal/mol for the Br, CH 3 , and OCH 3 reactions in water, 82 respectively. Calculation of a second Claisen rearrangement featuring allyl naphthyl ether (Scheme 5(b)) in five solvents: water, methanol, acetonitrile, DMF, and toluene, which were consistent with the qualitative representation of the rates and yields given by Sharpless and coworkers.…”
Section: Pericyclic Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar trend is observed for the PCM model (see the supplementary material) 116 and also observed previously for different reactions. 80,81 The above trend may be attributed to the inadequate description of solute-solvent specific interactions including hydrogen bonds. Another possible reason is that the apparent surface charge used in the continuum model is proportional to f(ε) = (ε − 1)/(ε + 1/2), which is a rather flat function for ε > 20.…”
Section: A Finkelstein Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this SMD implicit solvent model failed to reproduce the experimentally observed changes in the rate of reaction in water and organic solvents. It is noteworthy that a report on the use of the B3LYP/PCM/6‐31G(d) method also failed to predict an accurate sequence of reaction rates of allyl p ‐tolyl ether rearrangement in solution …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that ar eport on the use of the B3LYP/PCM/6-31G(d) method also failed to predict an accurate sequence of reaction rates of allyl p-tolyl ether rearrangementins olution. [42] Turning our attention toward rationalizing the origin of the computed energy differences, we consider that the changes in hydrogen-bond interactions along the reaction path are expected to be vital to the reaction at the vacuum-water interface (an on-water environment) and are not reflected in the continuum treatment. Hence, QM/MM/MCc alculations were used as follow-up investigations to obtain an explicit representation of solvent molecules [under solution conditions:i n DMSO ando n-water ( Figure 1), for comparison].…”
Section: Solvent Effects Studiedbyd Ft Calculations With the Smd Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%