2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2019.06.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Kalman-filtering derivation of simultaneous input and state estimation

Abstract: Simultaneous input and state estimation algorithms are studied as particular limits of Kalman filtering problems. This admits interpretation of the algorithm properties and critical analysis of their claims to being partly model-free and to providing unbiased estimates. A disturbance model, white noise of unbounded variance, is provided and the bias feature is shown to be a geometric projection property rather than probabilistic in nature. As a consequence of this analysis, the algorithm is connected, in the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first describe the filtering method. A summary of KF-SISE, presented in [9], is given in the following subsection.…”
Section: Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We first describe the filtering method. A summary of KF-SISE, presented in [9], is given in the following subsection.…”
Section: Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where x t , w t ∈ R n are the state vector and process noise at time step t, d t ∈ R m is the disturbance signal from the unknown part of the system, and y t , v t ∈ R m are the measurements and the measurement noise. The following assumptions are required to use the Kalman filtering formulation of SISE [9]. Assumption 1: The following is assumed to hold: i w t ∼ N (0, Q), v t ∼ N (0, R) and initial condition x O ∼ N (x 0|0 , P O ) are mutually independent Gaussian white noises, ii R is diagonal positive definite matrix, iii the pair (A, C) is observable, and rank CG = rank G = m. By defining X t+1 , K t+1 , M t+1 , D t and P t+1 respectively as the prior state covariance matrix, the Kalman gain for the state vector, the Kalman gain for the unknown input vector, the posterior disturbance covariance matrix and the posterior state covariance matrix, and xt+1|t+1 as the posterior estimates for the state and dt|t+1 as the estimate for the unknown input of the system, and the measurement sequence, Y t+1 {y t+1 , y t , .…”
Section: A Filtering Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Intuitively, when Q k d tends to be infinity, the result of AKF will be equal to that of the RTSF method. More recently, the equivalence between AKF in the infinity condition and MVU filter has been proved, respectively, in [19, 20] for the system that unknown input only affects the state. However, in the direct feedthrough systems, whether or not the result of corresponding AKF in the infinity condition will be equal to that of RTSF is still unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%