2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2022.117516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A kernel canonical correlation analysis approach for removing environmental and operational variations for structural damage identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Residuals of canonical variables follow a multivariate normal distribution with zero mean, and the covariance matrix is given by Equation (25). Therefore, it is reasonable to utilize the following statistical data for detection purposes:…”
Section: Dynamic Canonical Correlation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Residuals of canonical variables follow a multivariate normal distribution with zero mean, and the covariance matrix is given by Equation (25). Therefore, it is reasonable to utilize the following statistical data for detection purposes:…”
Section: Dynamic Canonical Correlation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [12] first employed data-driven CCA techniques to achieve residual generation based on canonical correlation, yielding favorable fault detection results. Subsequently, CCA-based methods have been extensively researched and improved by numerous scholars [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the detection of abnormal structural dynamic characteristics needs to firstly eliminate the normal variation component caused by variable action. Hang et al proposed an abnormality detection method that integrates kernel canonical correlation analysis and cointegration theory to deal with the nonlinearity of monitoring data in practical engineering [20]. Wang et al used a method based on the Bayesian framework to achieve data component separation and structural state identification [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%