2014
DOI: 10.1109/mpot.2012.2202135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Keyword-Driven Tool for Testing Web Applications (KeyDriver)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, keyword-based test automation tools are being used to overcome the aforesaid issues of test automation tools. Though keyword-driven testing tools require substantial efforts in terms of time and expertise to develop keyword libraries, but keyword-driven testing is application independent, easy to maintain and scalable [24]. To facilitate test engineers in test cases execution and to reduce test maintenance efforts, our testing automation framework supports two test execution methods: execution of functionally decompose test scripts and keyword-based test case execution.…”
Section: Figure 1 Scenario-based Testing Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, keyword-based test automation tools are being used to overcome the aforesaid issues of test automation tools. Though keyword-driven testing tools require substantial efforts in terms of time and expertise to develop keyword libraries, but keyword-driven testing is application independent, easy to maintain and scalable [24]. To facilitate test engineers in test cases execution and to reduce test maintenance efforts, our testing automation framework supports two test execution methods: execution of functionally decompose test scripts and keyword-based test case execution.…”
Section: Figure 1 Scenario-based Testing Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developing automated test scripts requires test engineers to learn scripting language which is time consuming. To address this issue Gupta and Bajpai (2014) Chan et al (2007) proposed framework for testing SOA applications. This study is extension of Chan et al (2005).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But if there are changes to the website that is being tested, it will take a long time to change back the tests that have been done previously, in contrast to testing using Keyword Driven Testing. In Keyword-Driven Testing, all the keywords used for testing a ISSN 2085-4552 website can be easily added, removed and modified so that if there are changes to the website, the test does not need to be done from scratch [8]. By using Keyword-Driven Testing, the tests created can be easier to maintain and allow for easy understanding so that all team members can work together to carry out the test [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, similar research explains that Keyword Driven Testing saves a lot of manual testing by automating the website testing process for various test cases and also every keyword that has been used can be reused to test different websites [8]. In research on the evolution of Keyword Driven Testing shows that Keyword Driven Testing has a complex design with several levels of abstraction and a design that supports reuse, more than 60% of keywords used have the potential to reduce changes required during evolution by up to 70% [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%