2019
DOI: 10.5937/fmet1903405l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A kinematic and workspace analysis of a parallel rehabilitation device for head-neck injured patients

Abstract: Current treatment for patients suffering from cervical spine injuries is by static braces which causes discomfort and immobilization of the neck. This paper presents a novel comfortable wearable therapy device for treating patients suffering with head/neck posture problems using parallel mechanism concept. To achieve this, a conceptual design of a threedegrees-of-freedom Revolute-Prismatic-Spherical configuration parallel manipulator with 3 extensible links is proposed. However, precision and workspace are the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The right/left lateral bending movement ranged from −6.97 ± 0.01° to 7.02 ± 0.01° with accuracies of 99.89% and 99.48%, which limits lateral bending motion to 17% of normal (−42° to 41°) [ 47 ]. Compared to Lingampally's study which had maximum angular tilt between −15° to 15° [ 46 ], as the design used in his study had maximum extension of the links ranging from 120 mm to 160 mm, our study used links ranging from 53 mm to 73 mm. Moreover, the fixed base and top platform radius were 320 mm and 250 mm, respectively, in his study, but our study used equal fixed and movable platforms with radius 95 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The right/left lateral bending movement ranged from −6.97 ± 0.01° to 7.02 ± 0.01° with accuracies of 99.89% and 99.48%, which limits lateral bending motion to 17% of normal (−42° to 41°) [ 47 ]. Compared to Lingampally's study which had maximum angular tilt between −15° to 15° [ 46 ], as the design used in his study had maximum extension of the links ranging from 120 mm to 160 mm, our study used links ranging from 53 mm to 73 mm. Moreover, the fixed base and top platform radius were 320 mm and 250 mm, respectively, in his study, but our study used equal fixed and movable platforms with radius 95 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of them, which was dynamic, was used as a measuring tool for human head movement [ 44 ]; then, it was developed as an assistive device for dropped head syndrome (DHS) [ 45 ]. Another one was developed as a special wearable therapy device for assisting patients who were suffering from the head/neck posture problems [ 46 ]. A preliminary design for a dynamic neck brace was recently developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizing parallel robots in rehabilitation enables specialists to help patients regain strength and mobility in affected joints more rapidly and efficiently than traditional therapeutic methods. The scope of these technologies includes rehabilitation devices for patients with head and neck injuries [1][2][3][4]; pediatric rehabilitation devices for the arm [5]; wearable rehabilitation devices for the arm [6]; exoskeletons for the arms of patients with stroke and spinal cord injuries [7]; and devices specifically designed for wrist [8][9][10], ankle [11][12][13][14][15][16], and foot rehabilitation [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Another proposed solution was a three-degrees-of-freedom Revolute-Prismatic-Spherical configuration parallel manipulator. 24,25 However, this design rigidly enclosed the neck and supported the head at the level of the chin, which made conversation and breathing challenging for the patient. A cable-driven robotic brace capable of providing three degrees of freedom in human head movements was also introduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%