1998
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199805001-00173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Kinematic Comparison of Mountain and Road Bicycle Pedalling in Experienced Mountain Bikers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are disparities in the results. Some studies have shown that use of minimalist shoes may help in reducing injuries 8 because of greater ankle plantar flexion during landing 7 9 , resulting in more anterior foot contacts (forefoot and midfoot striking as opposed to the rearfoot) 8 , which reduces loading rate and vertical ground reaction forces 9 . A recent systematic review has shown that being a non-rearfoot striker is associated with lower retrospective injury rates and vertical loading, but recommendations cannot be made for runners to change strike pattern to reduce injury 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there are disparities in the results. Some studies have shown that use of minimalist shoes may help in reducing injuries 8 because of greater ankle plantar flexion during landing 7 9 , resulting in more anterior foot contacts (forefoot and midfoot striking as opposed to the rearfoot) 8 , which reduces loading rate and vertical ground reaction forces 9 . A recent systematic review has shown that being a non-rearfoot striker is associated with lower retrospective injury rates and vertical loading, but recommendations cannot be made for runners to change strike pattern to reduce injury 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large amount of the current literature surrounding minimalist footwear focuses on changes in running kinematics and efficiency with use of minimalist shoes compared to traditional running shoes (TRS), with findings of reduced stride length, increased stride frequency 7 , and even reduced energy expenditure 4 . However, there are disparities in the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%