A kinematic model of Kármán gaiting in rainbow trout

Abstract

SUMMARYA mechanistic understanding of how fishes swim in unsteady flows is challenging despite its prevalence in nature. Previous kinematic studies of fish Kármán gaiting in a vortex street behind a cylinder only report time-averaged measurements, precluding our ability to formally describe motions on a cycle-by-cycle basis. Here we present the first analytical model that describes the swimming kinematics of Kármán gaiting trout with 70-90% accuracy. We found that body bending kinematics can be modelled with a travelling wave equation, which has also been shown to accurately model free-stream swimming kinematics. However, freestream swimming and Kármán gaiting are separated in the parameter space; the amplitude, wavelength and frequency values of the traveling wave equation are substantially different for each behavior. During Kármán gaiting, the wave is initiated at the body center, which is 0.2L (where L is total body length) further down the body compared with the initiation point in free-stream swimming. The wave travels with a constant speed, which is higher than the nominal flow speed just as in free-stream swimming. In addition to undulation, we observed that Kármán gaiting fish also exhibit substantial lateral translations and body rotations, which can constitute up to 75% of the behavior. These motions are periodic and their frequencies also match the vortex shedding frequency. There is an inverse correlation between head angle and body angle: when the body rotates in one direction, the head of the fish turns into the opposite direction. Our kinematic model mathematically describes how fish swim in vortical flows in real time and provides a platform to better understand the effects of flow variations as well as the contribution of muscle activity during corrective motions.

Accelerating fishes increase propulsive efficiency by modulating vortex ring geometry

“…To more closely investigate the kinematics and hydrodynamics of acceleration, we chose a generalized teleost fish, the rainbow trout (Oncoryhnchus mykiss). The swimming kinematics of this species have been studied in great detail for steady swimming and other behaviors but not for acceleration (5,13,(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54). Like those in other species tested in this study, the body amplitudes of trout are higher during acceleration than during steady swimming ( Fig.…”

Fish optimize sensing and respiration during undulatory swimming

“…We identified the movement combinations that produced the lowest and highest CoT and recorded the swimming kinematics of the physical model with high-speed video (250 frames per s). After extracting the midlines for the whole body, we calculated the amplitude and phase envelope using a Fourier analysis 41 . We represented the lateral motion of each point along the midline with a periodic sine function.…”

A numerical study of fish adaption behaviors in complex environments with a deep reinforcement learning and immersed boundary–lattice Boltzmann method

“…2 , is the maximum deflection angle at the trailing edge, is the wavelength, is the period, t is the time, for and for , and h is the waveform function described by where can be determined by , , , and . This undulatory motion is constructed based on extensive videos of rainbow trout free swimming, rheotaxis and Kármán gaiting 49 – 51 . It allows the swimmer to change its periods, amplitudes and wavelengths smoothly and arbitrarily every half period.…”