2023
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202211260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Kinetic Control Strategy for One‐Pot Synthesis of Efficient Bimetallic Metal‐Organic Framework/Layered Double Hydroxide Heterojunction Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysts

Abstract: Heterojunction materials are promising candidates for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) electrocatalysts to break the linear scaling relationship and lower the reaction barrier. However, the application of heterojunction materials is always hindered by the complicated multistep synthetic procedures which bring cost, complexity, and reproducibility issues. Herein, a strategy of kinetic controlled synthesis is developed to achieve the one-pot formation of bimetallic metal-organic framework (MOF)/layered double hyd… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, NiFe-LDH/MoS 2 –Ni 3 S 2 /NF affords a cell voltage of 1.50 V to achieve a current density of 10 mA cm –2 in comparison to those of MoS 2 –Ni 3 S 2 /NF (1.55 V), Ni 3 S 2 /NF (1.73 V), NiFe-LDH/NF (1.69 V), and RuO 2 /NF||Pt–C/NF (1.66 V), indicating that NiFe-LDH/MoS 2 –Ni 3 S 2 /NF has excellent overall water splitting performance, as shown in Figure b. Compared with other related overall water splitting electrocatalysts reported in recent years (see Figure c and Table ), the cell voltage of NiFe-LDH/MoS 2 –Ni 3 S 2 /NF is superior to those of numerous other reported transition metal NiFe-LDH and MoS 2 –Ni 3 S 2 -based as well as RuO 2 ||Pt–C electrocatalysts. …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, NiFe-LDH/MoS 2 –Ni 3 S 2 /NF affords a cell voltage of 1.50 V to achieve a current density of 10 mA cm –2 in comparison to those of MoS 2 –Ni 3 S 2 /NF (1.55 V), Ni 3 S 2 /NF (1.73 V), NiFe-LDH/NF (1.69 V), and RuO 2 /NF||Pt–C/NF (1.66 V), indicating that NiFe-LDH/MoS 2 –Ni 3 S 2 /NF has excellent overall water splitting performance, as shown in Figure b. Compared with other related overall water splitting electrocatalysts reported in recent years (see Figure c and Table ), the cell voltage of NiFe-LDH/MoS 2 –Ni 3 S 2 /NF is superior to those of numerous other reported transition metal NiFe-LDH and MoS 2 –Ni 3 S 2 -based as well as RuO 2 ||Pt–C electrocatalysts. …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47,48 To determine the rate-determining step and explore the real active site, the free energy of the intermediates (*OH, *O, and *OOH) of MIL-53(Fe) and MIL-53(Fe)@ZIF-67(Co) in the OER process was calculated using the DFT method. [48][49][50] The Gibbs free energy profiles in Fig. 5c and Fig.…”
Section: Dft Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tailoring their structure, texture, and surface properties are crucial to enhance their OER performance. [24] The OER performances of the original ZIF-67, the calcined sample (450 °C, Co 3 O 4 ), and the typical etched samples by O 3 , H 2 O, and O 3 /H 2 O were compared (Figure 5 and Table 1). In the linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves (Figure 5a), at a current density of 10 mA cm −2 , the original ZIF-67 and calcined sample exhibit high overpotentials of 398 and 396 mV, while all the etched samples show lower values.…”
Section: Electrocatalytic Oer Performancementioning
confidence: 99%