2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.01.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A kinetic model for evaluating the dependence of the quantum yield of nano-TiO2 based photocatalysis on light intensity, grain size, carrier lifetime, and minority carrier diffusion coefficient: Indirect interfacial charge transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicate that high quantum yields (short circuit current) can be achieved even with short carrier diffusion lengths by reducing the wire radius, but too short a radius actually results in very low quantum yield 95,96 . This is contrary to the nanoparticles that show monotonic increase when particle size decreases 94 . The yield is reduced when the wire radius becomes so small that the inversion layer (where minority carrier concentration is higher than majority carrier concentration) near the surface occupies a significant fraction of the total electrode volume, so that 31 recombination near the surface dominates device operation 95,96 .…”
Section: Electrode Geometry and Size Effectscontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results indicate that high quantum yields (short circuit current) can be achieved even with short carrier diffusion lengths by reducing the wire radius, but too short a radius actually results in very low quantum yield 95,96 . This is contrary to the nanoparticles that show monotonic increase when particle size decreases 94 . The yield is reduced when the wire radius becomes so small that the inversion layer (where minority carrier concentration is higher than majority carrier concentration) near the surface occupies a significant fraction of the total electrode volume, so that 31 recombination near the surface dominates device operation 95,96 .…”
Section: Electrode Geometry and Size Effectscontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…This leads to a model, where transport is mainly driven by diffusion. At first, it would seem that even in electrodes the size of the structures would most likely affect charge collection very similarly to the size of the individual photocatalyst nanoparticles with diffusive charge transport 65,93,94 : When the diffusion length is large compared with the structure size, bulk recombination can be neglected and the quantum yield is affected only by surface recombination 93 . In contrast, when the diffusion length is very short compared with the size of the structures, charges created in the bulk will recombine before reaching the interface 93 , and hence transport can be neglected, because those charges that manage to get to the surface appear as if they were stationary since they did not come far from it.…”
Section: Electrode Geometry and Size Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At higher AFRs the gas retention time in the photocatalytic reactor would be too short to provide sufficient IPA transfer from the gas phase to the solid catalyst surface [26,27]. The gas retention times in the current study were 72, efficiency is proportional to light intensity [30,31]. However, the daylight (1.1 mW cm -2 ), which exhibited higher IPA cleaning efficiency, had lower light intensity compared to that of the LEDs (2.2 mW cm -2 ).…”
Section: Surface Characteristics Of Photocatalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes define two regimes as regards to the effect of light intensity on PDEs: 1) a first-order regime in which electronhole pairs are consumed more rapidly by chemical reactions than by recombination, that is, at low light intensity and high input concentration, and 2) a half-order regime in which recombination is the most dominant process, that is, at high light intensity and low input concentration. At even higher light intensities, PDE becomes independent of light intensity and the reaction rate becomes mass transfer limited (Liu and Zhao, 2010;Sekiguchi et al, 2010).…”
Section: Photocatalytic Activity Dependence On Light Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%