2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A kinetic study of microalgae, municipal sludge and cedar wood co-pyrolysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, with the increasing addition of RH or HS to SS, the experimental pyrolysis temperature range presented a gradual drop from 144.5 to 95.2 °C for the blend of SS/RH and from 144.5 to 88.8 °C for the blend of SS/HS. This shortened pyrolysis temperature range was related to the rising initial and the falling final pyrolysis temperature for the related blends, which could be attributed to the increasing portion of volatile matter in the blends, and this result was consistent with previous studies. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, with the increasing addition of RH or HS to SS, the experimental pyrolysis temperature range presented a gradual drop from 144.5 to 95.2 °C for the blend of SS/RH and from 144.5 to 88.8 °C for the blend of SS/HS. This shortened pyrolysis temperature range was related to the rising initial and the falling final pyrolysis temperature for the related blends, which could be attributed to the increasing portion of volatile matter in the blends, and this result was consistent with previous studies. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This shortened pyrolysis temperature range was related to the rising initial and the falling final pyrolysis temperature for the related blends, which could be attributed to the increasing portion of volatile matter in the blends, and this result was consistent with previous studies. 20,21 Furthermore, in the blending of either SS/RH or SS/HS, the experimental pyrolysis temperature ranges show a similar trend to their corresponding calculated results, but the former was lower by 6.7−20.4 °C than the latter at the same blending ratio and blending precursors. These results were due to the synergistic effect during co-pyrolysis of the blending of SS/RH or SS/HS.…”
Section: Physical Characteristics Of Blendssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The first two materials' contributions mainly involved lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose (Castillo-Toro et al 2021 ). These polymers have complex chemical structures, with stable chemical bonds (ether, carbon–carbon, β-glucosides, among others), high aromaticity (lignin), a high C:N ratios and low moisture percentages (9.04 ± 0.29 and 7.43 ± 0.57%, for RM 1 /LCM and RM 3 /PB, respectively) (Castillo-Toro et al 2021 ; Chakraborty et al 2021 ), (Table 2 ). In addition, the lignocellulose meshes (RM 1 /LCM) had dead fungal and bacterial biogenic biomass, which remained attached to the meshes after being used in wastewater treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most commonly used agro-industrial wastes for the co-pyrolysis process with sludge is lignocellulosic biomasses (tree bark, leaves, sawdust and shavings) generated in forestry companies (Moreno-Bayona et al 2019 ; Castillo-Toro et al 2021 ; Céspedes-Bernal et al 2021 ). These wastes provide lignin, a resistant aromatic polymer with high carbon/nitrogen ratios and low biodegradability (Yoo et al 2020 ; He et al 2021 ), that once thermally transformed, allows biochar with higher slow-release carbon content to be obtained compared to biochar obtained using only biogenic biomass from secondary or tertiary sludge (Chen et al 2017 ; Chakraborty et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the higher yield rate co-pyrolysis technique is highly influenced by individual components of biomass (Volpe et al, 2018). Sourabh Chakraborty et al (Chakraborty et al, 2021) examined the co-pyrolysis process using digested sludge, algal biomass and cedarwood for the production of bio-oil through thermochemical techniques. Even though the co-pyrolysis technique has reduced the oxygen content in the resultant products, the bio-oil extracted rate is slightly higher than other conventional pyrolysis (Zhao et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%