2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A kinetics modeling study on the inhibition of glucose on cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, the lowest cellulosomal enzyme activities were found in GCs1, even though H. thermocellum growing on glucose is not subject to carbon catabolite repression [30]. The observed GAs1 enzyme activities were in agreement with a study by Zhang et al [59], who used kinetic models and empirical experiments to prove that glucose was an inhibitor of the H. thermocellum cellulosome. Other reports also indicated that cellobiose was a strong inhibitor of cellulosome and cellulase [41,42].…”
Section: Growth Patterns Sugar Utilization Cellulosomal Enzyme Actisupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Surprisingly, the lowest cellulosomal enzyme activities were found in GCs1, even though H. thermocellum growing on glucose is not subject to carbon catabolite repression [30]. The observed GAs1 enzyme activities were in agreement with a study by Zhang et al [59], who used kinetic models and empirical experiments to prove that glucose was an inhibitor of the H. thermocellum cellulosome. Other reports also indicated that cellobiose was a strong inhibitor of cellulosome and cellulase [41,42].…”
Section: Growth Patterns Sugar Utilization Cellulosomal Enzyme Actisupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, the final cell biomass of FAs1 and GAs1 was still lower than that of CGs1, in contrast to the results obtained in the work of Johnson et al [ 29 ], who found that the final H. thermocellum cell density of FAs1, GAs1 and CGs1 was comparable. As the most powerful hydrolytic machinery that has been identified in a microorganism to date, H. thermocellum cellulosomal function, composition, and regulation patterns have been a popular research topic for decades [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 7 , 12 , 14 , 17 , 18 , 25 , 26 , 28 , 29 , 43 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 ]. Regarding cellulosomal enzyme activities, FAs1 cellulosomes expressed the highest exoglucanase, endoglucanase, and xylanase activities, followed by CGs1 cellulosomes ( Figure 2 B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinetics parameters of maximum reaction rate ( V max ) and the Michaelis–Menten constant ( K m ) values displayed a prevailing effect when the cellulosome obtained in the supernatant as compared to the whole cells. Recently, a mathematical model was developed to estimate the inhibitory effect of glucose on cellulosome by using C. thermocellum (Equation (1)) [92] C=K−K·Av where C was the glucose concentration, K was the inhibition constant for glucose on cellulosome, v was the rate of the hydrolytic action of cellulosome, and constant A could be deduced from the slope of the straight line, which plotted based on C versus 1/ v . It described the relationship between glucose concentration and saccharification rate at a specific glucose concentration or a specific time.…”
Section: Effects Of Several Substrate-related Factors On Cellulosomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, methods that can decrease the glucose-induced inhibition on cellulosome should be effective in enhancing cellulose saccharification by the anaerobic cellulosome-producing bacteria [93]. Attempts to eliminate side reactions such as ethanol and CO 2 fermentation proved the utilization of certain adsorbents (i.e., activated carbon and biochar) could lower the inhibition of glucose and improve the adsorption of substrates onto cellulosome [92].…”
Section: Effects Of Several Substrate-related Factors On Cellulosomentioning
confidence: 99%