1994
DOI: 10.1016/0954-1810(94)90003-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A knowledge base for finite element mesh design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A literal such as neighbor (a3,X) is called nondeterminate because the "input" argument a3 does not necessarily determine the "output" argument X (if a3 has several neigh-bors, X can be any one of them). In spite of this, a "determinate" version of background knowledge description also was used in our earlier experiments (Dol Ysak & Muggleton, 1992;Dol Ysak et al, 1994) with the ILP program GOLEM (Muggleton & Feng, 1990), which is restricted to determinate literals only. CLAUDIEN allows nondeterminate literals.…”
Section: Topological Relations Between the Edgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literal such as neighbor (a3,X) is called nondeterminate because the "input" argument a3 does not necessarily determine the "output" argument X (if a3 has several neigh-bors, X can be any one of them). In spite of this, a "determinate" version of background knowledge description also was used in our earlier experiments (Dol Ysak & Muggleton, 1992;Dol Ysak et al, 1994) with the ILP program GOLEM (Muggleton & Feng, 1990), which is restricted to determinate literals only. CLAUDIEN allows nondeterminate literals.…”
Section: Topological Relations Between the Edgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we describe the application of ILP to this problem following Dol~ak et al [12,13], also presented in [6]. An earlier experiment is described in [14].…”
Section: Finite-element Mesh Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no known general method that would enable automatic determination of optimal, or reasonably good meshes. ILP techniques have been successfully applied by Dolgak et al [12,14,13] towards the automation of mesh design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each paradigm has its advantages and limitations and so any future FEA package/design tool that wishes to achieve the ideals of a perfect FE implementation [10] should try to take into account the feasibility of incorporating such methods based on their limitations rather than their advantages [32]. [15], [16], [22], [24], [28], [33], [39], [40], [49], [50], [54], [[57], [59], [77], [82]} Quicker convergence of solutions based on "learnt" Mesh patterns { [1], [3], [15], [16], [18], [38], [42], [58], [71] A cognitive mapping for the FEM is now presented, which entails detailing the nature of how each AI technique has been and could be applied to FEMG in particular. This is done so as to develop a framework for incorporating AI within the FEA process (see Section IIIB).…”
Section: A Classification Of Ai Methods Applied To Finite Elementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Software implementations of the method, can sometimes be needlessly verbose and technical, so much so that even experts find difficulty in the modelling of relatively straightforward problems ( [10], [12], [30], [52], [68]). Using previous knowledge and interrelationships between model parameters, to overcome such problems does not mean that such a technique is always adaptable to new design scenarios ( [15], [16], [27], [46], [51]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%