2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-33625-1_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Knowledge-Based Approach for Provisions’ Categorization in Arabic Normative Texts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency‐increasing capacity of artificial intelligence has been recognized through the increased incorporation of AI‐based systems in the application and the administration of law (Surden, 2022). Natural Language Processing (NLP), as a subfield of artificial intelligence, has been used in several legal technologies such as automatic summarization (Gelbart & Smith, 1991; Polsley et al, 2016) and classification (de Araujo et al, 2020; Li et al, 2019) of legal documents, identification and specification of normative provisions' categories (Berrazega et al, 2016; Bouhyaoui et al, 2018), legal question answering systems (Do et al, 2017; Morimoto et al, 2017; Taniguchi et al, 2018), documents automation (Hassan & Le, 2020) and court decisions analysis (Metsker et al, 2019). A recent monograph (Frolova & Ermakova, 2022) states that prediction of court decisions is one of the captivating legal technologies that increasingly attracts the attention of legal practitioners and NLP researchers alike.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency‐increasing capacity of artificial intelligence has been recognized through the increased incorporation of AI‐based systems in the application and the administration of law (Surden, 2022). Natural Language Processing (NLP), as a subfield of artificial intelligence, has been used in several legal technologies such as automatic summarization (Gelbart & Smith, 1991; Polsley et al, 2016) and classification (de Araujo et al, 2020; Li et al, 2019) of legal documents, identification and specification of normative provisions' categories (Berrazega et al, 2016; Bouhyaoui et al, 2018), legal question answering systems (Do et al, 2017; Morimoto et al, 2017; Taniguchi et al, 2018), documents automation (Hassan & Le, 2020) and court decisions analysis (Metsker et al, 2019). A recent monograph (Frolova & Ermakova, 2022) states that prediction of court decisions is one of the captivating legal technologies that increasingly attracts the attention of legal practitioners and NLP researchers alike.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%