2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A laboratory-based approach to determine Archie's cementation factor for shale reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, some researchers stated "m" varied in a range of 1.0~3.0 according to lithology (1~1.5 in fractured hard rocks, 1.6~2.3 in sandstone, 2.28 in shaly sandstone, and 2.3~3.0 in carbonate) [3,49,52,53]. In terms of shale, the cementation factor m in gas shale reservoirs was around 1.6 to 1.7, below 2 in oil shale reservoirs, between 1.31 and 1.86 in Cauvery basin, and was around 1.6 in laboratory experiment [7,[54][55][56][57]. Recently, several relatively high m values of 2.9-3.6 under different salinity and 2.70 accounting for stress in Ordovician Goldwyer Formation from the Canning Basin are derived, together with 2.2 in Eagle Ford [58,59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Likewise, some researchers stated "m" varied in a range of 1.0~3.0 according to lithology (1~1.5 in fractured hard rocks, 1.6~2.3 in sandstone, 2.28 in shaly sandstone, and 2.3~3.0 in carbonate) [3,49,52,53]. In terms of shale, the cementation factor m in gas shale reservoirs was around 1.6 to 1.7, below 2 in oil shale reservoirs, between 1.31 and 1.86 in Cauvery basin, and was around 1.6 in laboratory experiment [7,[54][55][56][57]. Recently, several relatively high m values of 2.9-3.6 under different salinity and 2.70 accounting for stress in Ordovician Goldwyer Formation from the Canning Basin are derived, together with 2.2 in Eagle Ford [58,59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Archie proposed his representative equation in 1942, the barrier between fluid saturation calculation and resistivity logging data has been broken, sparking a scientific sensation throughout the entire energy industry [1][2][3][4]. Despite several alternative models, Archie formula is still popular for determining water saturation in shale [5][6][7]. These researchers were convinced that Archie's model was superior to other approaches if the accuracy of relative parameters could be improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Values of 1, 2 and 2, are widely used in the conventional setting, however, these are appropriate only for clay-poor rocks with well-connected pores. Some authors have suggested that the cementation exponent is the fundamental parameter that should be adjusted in the case of shales, which led Malekimostaghim et al (2019) to conduct a laboratory study to determine a reasonable value for shale. We use their determined value of 1.6 in our calculations.…”
Section: Water Saturationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main method used for saturation evaluation is electrical logging, particularly the Archie evaluation method. , However, the Archie model has limited applicable conditions, i.e., medium-to-large-pore pure sandstone formations with formation water as the only conductive medium. For increasingly complex reservoirs, scholars have further developed and improved the Archie model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%