ASME 2012 Noise Control and Acoustics Division Conference 2012
DOI: 10.1115/ncad2012-1270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Laboratory Framework for Synchronous Near/Far-Field Acoustics and MHz PIV in High-Temperature, Shock-Containing, Jets

Abstract: This paper describes the experimental study of the noise generating characteristics of high-temperature, shock-containing jets emanating from conic-section, converging-diverging (C-D) nozzles. Conic C-D nozzles consist of two conic sections, one contracting and the other expanding, joined to form a supersonic nozzle with a very sharp radius of curvature at the nozzle throat. An experiment is conducted in which temporally resolved flow-field measurements are acquired simultaneously with near-field and far-field… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, we shall examine a nozzle that consists of a straight walled convergent-divergent section, which we shall refer to as the conic nozzle; the interested reader is referred to Murray et al 9 for nozzle geometry details. Based on the throat-to-exit area ratio, the conic nozzle has a prescribed "design" operating Mach number of M j = 1.74.…”
Section: Configurations and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To this end, we shall examine a nozzle that consists of a straight walled convergent-divergent section, which we shall refer to as the conic nozzle; the interested reader is referred to Murray et al 9 for nozzle geometry details. Based on the throat-to-exit area ratio, the conic nozzle has a prescribed "design" operating Mach number of M j = 1.74.…”
Section: Configurations and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LES/FW-H codes described here have been extensively used for the prediction of jet noise for a wide variety of subsonic and supersonic jets in both free and impinging jet configurations. [20][21][22] In order to supplement the CFD computations, some experimental phased array tests were conducted in the Anechoic Jet Laboratory (AJL) at the University of Mississippis National Center for Physical Acoustics; facility details can be found in Murray et al 9 This phased array system consists of 32 exponentially spaced Kulite pressure transducers (type XT-140, dynamic range = 0-100 psia), mounted on a stainless steel rod. This array was positioned 60.96 cm (24 inches) below the nozzle exit and offset 7.64 cm (2.94 inches) in the axial direction; the downstream end of the rod was inclined at an angle of 15 0 to the nozzle axis.…”
Section: Computational Capabilities and Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perform high-fidelity HRLES simulations of this configuration, and obtain adequate time-resolved data on the ADS (as dictated by the results of the previous item). 4. Using FW-H equations, propagate the acoustics on the ADS to microphone locations on the linear array that was used in the experimental measurements.…”
Section: Configurations and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more thorough review of these measurements can be found in Murray et al (2012) 12 who showed the effect of a ceuterbody and faceted internal geometry on the near and far-field pressure. In particular, the center-body was found to increase the broadband shock noise signature registered by both near and far-field microphone arrays located at steep and sideline angles to the jet axis.…”
Section: A Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative approaches, based on vortex sound theory, have also been proposed whereby the role of vorticity is more explicit in the formulation. This began with the pioneering work of Powell (1964) 13 and Möhring (1978) 11 which has since transcended to the recent articles by Schräm & Hirschberg (2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%