2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017wr021115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Lagging Model for Describing Drawdown Induced by a Constant‐Rate Pumping in a Leaky Confined Aquifer

Abstract: This study proposes a generalized Darcy's law with considering phase lags in both the water flux and drawdown gradient to develop a lagging flow model for describing drawdown induced by constant‐rate pumping (CRP) in a leaky confined aquifer. The present model has a mathematical formulation similar to the dual‐porosity model. The Laplace‐domain solution of the model with the effect of wellbore storage is derived by the Laplace transform method. The time‐domain solution for the case of neglecting the wellbore s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In short, a greater τ sD would result in a larger s D while a greater τ qD would yield a smaller one. These findings are similar to the work of Lin and Yeh (), but their article deals with the flow in leaky aquifers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In short, a greater τ sD would result in a larger s D while a greater τ qD would yield a smaller one. These findings are similar to the work of Lin and Yeh (), but their article deals with the flow in leaky aquifers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This study proposes a new analytical model for describing the spatiotemporal drawdown distribution induced by a CRP test in an unconfined aquifer considering the lagging effect proposed by Lin and Yeh () on the water table decline. Two lag times (i.e., τ q and τ s ) are introduced to Darcy's law for developing a new linearized free surface equation describing the water table decline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sensitivity analysis evaluates hydraulic head variation in response to the change in each of K r , K z , S s , S y , ω, and ε. The normalized sensitivity coefficient can be defined as (Liou and Yeh, 1997) Solutions 4 and 5 a Solution 6 a,b…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity analysis evaluates hydraulic head variation in response to the change in each of K r , K z , S s , S y , ω, and ε. The normalized sensitivity coefficient can be defined as (Liou and Yeh, 1997) 14k) with the roots of Eq. ( 15) and c 0 = a 1 p 0 /(p 0 + a 2 ) for DGD.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%