2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38171-3_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Lagrangian Relaxation for Golomb Rulers

Abstract: Abstract. The Golomb Ruler Problem asks to position n integer marks on a ruler such that all pairwise distances between the marks are distinct and the ruler has minimum total length. It is a very challenging combinatorial problem, and provably optimal rulers are only known for n up to 26. Lower bounds can be obtained using Linear Programming formulations, but these are computationally expensive for large n. In this paper, we propose a new method for finding lower bounds based on a Lagrangian relaxation. We pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…sets of integers so that all pairwise sums of elements of the set are distinct. Lower bounds for the GRP and connections to number theory are discussed, respectively, in [14,23] and [7,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sets of integers so that all pairwise sums of elements of the set are distinct. Lower bounds for the GRP and connections to number theory are discussed, respectively, in [14,23] and [7,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, constructing a Golomb ruler with a given number of marks is an easy task, and there are many heuristic methods that provide high quality rulers. For instance, previous literature on heuristics has focused on affine and projective plane constructions [15,7], genetic algorithms [19], and local search [13,6] while exact methods based on constraint programming [17,8] or hybrid methods [16] exist as well. Although not proven to be NP-hard yet, solving the Golomb ruler problem exactly proved to be notoriously difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a comparison, it took 2.8 hours for the constraint programming model in [8] to find an optimal ruler for the 13-mark instance and another 11.8 hours to prove its optimality. The lean implementation of the search method in [16] reduced the respective computational effort to 0.6 and 1.3 hours, albeit at the expense of a significantly larger search tree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The bounds for the new propagator are based on a non-linear Lagrangian relaxation, with the multipliers being optimized via a subgradient method. Lagrangian relaxation has proved to be a powerful technique for performing reduced-cost filtering in CP, mainly in the context of linear relaxations of integer programs (e.g., [32][33][34]). The non-linear Lagrangian relaxation used in this paper is inspired by the work presented in [19], for solving resource constrained shortest path problems with a super additive objective function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%