1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00200816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A language to describe the growth of neurites

Abstract: How can biological plasticity been added to a simulation of neuritic growth? Coming from this question, we have chosen a new access to simulate neuritic growth under the very aspect of meaningful and progredient development of single cells. Based on a specific description-language, we have set up a computer-program, to construct neurite-models and to simulate neuritic interaction during their development. Instead of using mathematical equations, we define various types of cytoskeletons by taking a specified gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly, it was exceedingly challenging to translate morphological data into the L-system grammar and vice versa, making it impractical to compare virtual and real neurons (a problem never addressed in an earlier proposal to apply L-systems to neuronal cytoarchitecture). 13 Consequently, we decided to modify the L-system formalism by implementing Hillman's, Tamori's, and Burke's neuroanatomical algorithms instead of Lyndenmayer's formal rewrite rule. The resulting ''modified L-systems,'' called L-Neuron, 3 continues to make use of the turtle graphic interpretation of L-system strings, 28 and integrates the three adopted algorithms with a full account of branch angles (Fig.…”
Section: Modeling Dendritic Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, it was exceedingly challenging to translate morphological data into the L-system grammar and vice versa, making it impractical to compare virtual and real neurons (a problem never addressed in an earlier proposal to apply L-systems to neuronal cytoarchitecture). 13 Consequently, we decided to modify the L-system formalism by implementing Hillman's, Tamori's, and Burke's neuroanatomical algorithms instead of Lyndenmayer's formal rewrite rule. The resulting ''modified L-systems,'' called L-Neuron, 3 continues to make use of the turtle graphic interpretation of L-system strings, 28 and integrates the three adopted algorithms with a full account of branch angles (Fig.…”
Section: Modeling Dendritic Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maybe such an approach can be extended in the future to simulate metabolic networks of individual neurons (Ravasz et al, 2002;Strogatz, 2001). Similar simulations have been published (Ascoli, 1999;Ascoli et al, 2001;Burke et al, 1992;Bush and Sejnowski, 1993;Hamilton, 1993;Senft and Ascoli, 1999). These models can be used for a deeper understanding of the normal and pathologic processing of neuronal information on large scales close to functionally relevant biological microspace.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The L-systems are the parallel rewriting systems that successively and recursively enable the replacement parts of a simple object [50]. It has been used to simulate the development of a branching structure such as a tree [51] and neuronal dendritic arborizations [52,53]. As the extension of the L-systems, the open L-systems contain a computational module to simulate the communication between the object and its environment.…”
Section: Computational Modeling Of Nerve Growth and Pathfindingmentioning
confidence: 99%