2018
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2018.2851296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Large Antenna Array for Ka-Band Satcom-on-the-Move Applications—Accurate Modeling and Experimental Characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accurate analysis of this kind of array is not a trivial task. The analysis of the array can involve considering either the periodic and infinite lattice method [39] thanks to periodic boundaries on a unit cell and to a Floquet-Bloch formalism, or by considering the periodic but finite array method [40]. However, an extrapolation to sparse arrays is not possible, since the mutual coupling and shadowing effects generate almost similar radiation patterns, which means that constructive and destructive interferences are visible at almost the same radiation pattern angles for all of the antennas.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Densification Of The Receiving Arraymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accurate analysis of this kind of array is not a trivial task. The analysis of the array can involve considering either the periodic and infinite lattice method [39] thanks to periodic boundaries on a unit cell and to a Floquet-Bloch formalism, or by considering the periodic but finite array method [40]. However, an extrapolation to sparse arrays is not possible, since the mutual coupling and shadowing effects generate almost similar radiation patterns, which means that constructive and destructive interferences are visible at almost the same radiation pattern angles for all of the antennas.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Densification Of The Receiving Arraymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…well as all its electronic components (amplifiers, attenuators, power splitters and phase shifters) and S parameters effects on the active reflection coefficient. For example ONERA [6], [7] and XLIM University of Limoges [8]- [11] have shown the advantage of characterizing an antenna array by on the one hand the set of embedded radiation diagrams and on the other hand the Generalized Scattering Matrix (GSM) of the array. This then makes it possible to calculate by linear recombinations the antenna diagrams for scanning in azimuth and elevation without having to repeat the 3D simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method proposed in [10], [11], by taking advantage of existing formalisms on periodic arrays [3], [12], [13] and by using appropriate methods to efficiently exploit such formulations, accurately defines the performances of all building blocks, from the feeding circuits to the radiating elements, over a frequency range. However, the methodology to extract the scattering matrix of the array is based on a mix of periodic approximations (for the center elements) and partial local embedded zones for the border elements of the array.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To guarantee high-quality service, it requires wideband, multi-band, high-gain, or multiply polarized antennas [12]. Microstrip patch antennas (MPAs) [13], waveguide or horn antennas [14], and reflector antennas [15] are widely used in SatCom systems. Since DRAs enjoy wider bandwidth and higher efficiency than MPAs [9], [10], smaller feeding networks than waveguide antennas, and more compact size than reflectors, they are competent in SatCom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, antennas without firm structure tend to break down. MPAs are etched on circuit boards with their feeding networks [13]. Waveguide antennas use flange plates and advanced machining to ensure firmness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%