2022
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.52903.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A large-scale image dataset of wood surface defects for automated vision-based quality control processes

Abstract: The wood industry is facing many challenges. The high variability of raw material and the complexity of manufacturing processes results in a wide range of visible structure defects, which have to be controlled by trained specialists. These manual processes are not only tedious and biased, but also less effective. To overcome the drawbacks of the manual quality control processes, several automated vision-based systems have been proposed. Even though some conducted studies achieved a higher recognition rate than… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our goal was to quickly assess the feasibility of the method. We chose the subset of the large-scale image dataset of wood surface defects (Kodytek et al, 2022), which was modified by Nouman Ahsan (Large Scale Image Dataset of Wood Surface Defects, 2023) This subset contains 4,000 labelled images of eight different categories of wood surface defects, such as live knots, dead knots, and knots with cracks. Taking advantage of the pre-labelled images in the dataset, we divided it into three parts: 81.25% for training, 12.5% for validation, and 6.25% for testing.…”
Section: First Results With Yolov8nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our goal was to quickly assess the feasibility of the method. We chose the subset of the large-scale image dataset of wood surface defects (Kodytek et al, 2022), which was modified by Nouman Ahsan (Large Scale Image Dataset of Wood Surface Defects, 2023) This subset contains 4,000 labelled images of eight different categories of wood surface defects, such as live knots, dead knots, and knots with cracks. Taking advantage of the pre-labelled images in the dataset, we divided it into three parts: 81.25% for training, 12.5% for validation, and 6.25% for testing.…”
Section: First Results With Yolov8nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dataset of 2200 images is used in this study, which is acquired from the literature, in particular the work of Kodytek et al [34]. Of these 2200 images, 2000 are equally categorized into the two classes: (i) "Single knot", and (ii) "Multiple knots", as illustrated in Figure 2, each set containing 1000 images.…”
Section: Division Of the Dataset And Methodology Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the experiments, we utilized a large-scale image dataset of wood surface defects, which was generated by VSB-Technical University of Ostrava specifically for automated visual quality control processes [35]. This original dataset contains a total of 20,275 images, consisting of 1992 images without any defects and 18,283 images with one or more surface defects.…”
Section: Experimental Details and Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%