2023
DOI: 10.1039/d3cp03893a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A larger basis set describes atomization energy core–valence correction better than a higher-order coupled-cluster method

Aleksandr A. Chamkin,
Elena S. Chamkina

Abstract: The accuracy of coupled-cluster methods for the computation of core-valence correction to atomization energy was assessed. Truncation levels up to CCSDTQP were considered together with (aug-)cc-pwCVnZ (n = D, T,...

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(125 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in the case of the CC(t;3) and UBCCD(T) approaches, the HOC (TQ) CC energy correction to Δ E might have a smaller impact with larger than double-ζ basis sets. 122 Therefore, one can speculate that, with the mixed-ζ VXZ Dunning’s basis sets, the extrapolated CC estimates of Δ E set a lower limit in the case of ex-CC(t;3)-HOC and ex-UBCCD(T)-HOC, and an upper limit in the case of ex-LR-CCSD(T)-HOC.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, in the case of the CC(t;3) and UBCCD(T) approaches, the HOC (TQ) CC energy correction to Δ E might have a smaller impact with larger than double-ζ basis sets. 122 Therefore, one can speculate that, with the mixed-ζ VXZ Dunning’s basis sets, the extrapolated CC estimates of Δ E set a lower limit in the case of ex-CC(t;3)-HOC and ex-UBCCD(T)-HOC, and an upper limit in the case of ex-LR-CCSD(T)-HOC.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In other words, with the all-electron Dunning’s basis sets, the HOC corrected ex-LR-CCSD­(T) Δ E misses in practice quadruple corrections and rather represents the canonical perturbative triples result only. On the other hand, in the case of the CC­(t;3) and UBCCD­(T) approaches, the HOC (TQ) CC energy correction to Δ E might have a smaller impact with larger than double-ζ basis sets . Therefore, one can speculate that, with the mixed-ζ VXZ Dunning’s basis sets, the extrapolated CC estimates of Δ E set a lower limit in the case of ex-CC­(t;3)-HOC and ex-UBCCD­(T)-HOC, and an upper limit in the case of ex-LR-CCSD­(T)-HOC.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%