each series it is expected that two to three stages whose boundaries correspond to horizons that can be correlated with a high degree of confidence through all paleocontinents will be recognized. As emphasized by Geyer and Shergold (2000), communication of timestratigraphic information will be maximized if the internal subdivisions of the system correspond to horizons recognizable on all paleocontinents. Traditional, regional stratigraphic schemes, based principally on unit stratotypes, do not meet this goal, and it is for this reason that the ISCS is now engaged in further developing our understanding of key horizons for correlation within the Cambrian, and newly defined series and stages that are readily traceable among Cambrian regions. The newly defined chronostratigraphic units are based on the principle of boundary stratotypes, in which the base of one unit (marked by a Global boundary Stratotype Section and Point, or GSSP) automatically delimits the top of the underlying unit. So defined, these intervals differ in substance from unit stratotypes, which have been variously defined in Cambrian regions (Geyer and Shergold, 2000; Peng et al., 2004a, 2006; Babcock et al., 2005). Apart from the Guzhangian Stage (discussed here), the boundary positions relevant to the Cambrian (Figure 1) that have been ratified are: 1, the conterminant base of the Paleozoic Erathem, Cambrian System,