2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00529.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A latent class approach to investigating demand for genetically modified banana in Uganda

Abstract: Journal articleHarvestPlus; IFPRI3; ISI; HarvestPlus; PBSEPTD; HarvestPlusP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commonly used models to account for heterogeneity in preferences include the random parameter logit (RPL) [17,18] and the latent class model [19,20]. Both the RPL and LCM incorporate heterogeneity in attributes, the systematic component of utility, but are based on different assumptions about the heterogeneity distribution.…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Commonly used models to account for heterogeneity in preferences include the random parameter logit (RPL) [17,18] and the latent class model [19,20]. Both the RPL and LCM incorporate heterogeneity in attributes, the systematic component of utility, but are based on different assumptions about the heterogeneity distribution.…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The option for maintaining the status quo reflects a shopping choice for consumers who may prefer not to consume precooked beans. The alternative specific constant (ASC) was chosen to equal to 1 when the respondents selected options A or B and 0 for the option C [20]. If the ASC is negative and significant, then the propensity of the consumer to choose the status quo is high and vice versa.…”
Section: Choice Experiments (Ce) Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Variety choice is driven by farmers' demand for a number of variety traits (Smale et al, 2001). The paper follows arguments from previous literature that farmers choose varieties based on the bundles of observable characteristics that each variety embodies and produces (Smale et al, 1998;Edmeades and Smale, 2006;Wale and Yalew, 2007;Kikulwe et al, 2011). In this study, we assume that an individual farmer faces a choice among alternative hybrid banana varieties.…”
Section: The Choice Of Hybrid Banana Varieties: a Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We differentiate between consumer groups using the following parameters: differences by income group; willingnessto-pay (WTP) for GM bananas; spatial location; and whether or not they, as consumers of bananas, are also banana producers. This allowed us to investigate whether or not wealthier consumers may trust GM food labels, as those consumers are often opposed to GMOs, as suggested by Paarlberg (2008) and confirmed for Uganda by Kikulwe et al (2011a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%