2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0160-2896(01)00096-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

86
793
12
32

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 929 publications
(923 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
86
793
12
32
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with prior work in the verbal domain (Conway et al, 2002;, the WMC and STM constructs were highly correlated but separable for both our verbal-and visuospatial-task data. These findings are consistent with the view that simple and complex span tasks require some shared executive and storage-rehearsal processes but that WM span tasks require additional executive processes to deal with their dual-task demands, whereas STM tasks may elicit additional rehearsal processes that are disrupted by the secondary task in WM span.…”
Section: The Relation Between Wmc and Stmsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with prior work in the verbal domain (Conway et al, 2002;, the WMC and STM constructs were highly correlated but separable for both our verbal-and visuospatial-task data. These findings are consistent with the view that simple and complex span tasks require some shared executive and storage-rehearsal processes but that WM span tasks require additional executive processes to deal with their dual-task demands, whereas STM tasks may elicit additional rehearsal processes that are disrupted by the secondary task in WM span.…”
Section: The Relation Between Wmc and Stmsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, findings from latent-variable studies using verbal span tasks indicate that the executive component of WM, rather than the storage-STM component, carries the weight in the correlation between WM span and general fluid ability (Conway et al, 2002;. Our next analysis therefore addressed the relative contribution of executive-attentional, verbal storage-STM, and visuospatial storage-STM processes to the relation between immediate memory and reasoning.…”
Section: The Contribution Of Executive Attention To Fluid Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such model draws on the observed association between working memory capacity and fluid intelligence (Conway et al, 2002;Engle, Tuholski, Laughlin, & Conway, 1999;Kyllonen & Christal, 1990). This model has been invoked frequently in recent training research.…”
Section: Transfer Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If sufficient information cannot be retained in WM and integrated, it is assumed that various problems cannot be solved, and that reading or language comprehension cannot be completed. An important approach to WM has blossomed, in which experimental and psychometric methods are synthesized (e.g., Conway, Cowan, Bunting, Therriault, & Minkoff, 2002;Cowan et al, 1998;Engle, Tuholski, Laughlin, & Conway, 1999;Miyake, Friedman, Rettinger, Shah, & Hegarty, 2001). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%