2021
DOI: 10.1177/01423312211025337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A lateral control strategy for unmanned ground vehicles with model predictive control and active disturbance rejection control

Abstract: This paper presents a lateral control strategy with kinematic state error model-based predictive control and extended state observer for unmanned ground vehicles. Firstly, we propose a circular arc prediction technique to calculate the state of the reference system. Then, inspired by the idea of active disturbance rejection control, an extended state observer is utilized to estimate the value of the total disturbance caused by modeling uncertainties, external disturbance, and other factors in order to compensa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to deal with this problem, the extended state observer (ESO) can be used to estimate and compensate the high order approximation error terms in the FO Han (2009). Gao (2003) proposed a linear ESO based Active Disturbance Rejection Control (ADRC) tuning method to substantially simplify the original nonlinear controller in Han (2009) for practitioners, then this philosophy tremendously promotes the widespread application of ADRC Madonski et al (2019); Li et al (2020); Long et al (2017); Qiu et al (2014); Sun et al (2020); Piao et al (2020); Huang and Xue (2014); Zuo et al (2021). The linear ADRC is a linear control but its design concept is totally different from that of classical linear controllers and it can be applied to nonlinear, time-varying, and uncertain processes with very little model information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to deal with this problem, the extended state observer (ESO) can be used to estimate and compensate the high order approximation error terms in the FO Han (2009). Gao (2003) proposed a linear ESO based Active Disturbance Rejection Control (ADRC) tuning method to substantially simplify the original nonlinear controller in Han (2009) for practitioners, then this philosophy tremendously promotes the widespread application of ADRC Madonski et al (2019); Li et al (2020); Long et al (2017); Qiu et al (2014); Sun et al (2020); Piao et al (2020); Huang and Xue (2014); Zuo et al (2021). The linear ADRC is a linear control but its design concept is totally different from that of classical linear controllers and it can be applied to nonlinear, time-varying, and uncertain processes with very little model information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the previously mentioned state observers are usually model-based, that is, accurate model information is essential during their design process, so they are not suitable for systems with uncertain dynamics. Thanks to the Han's works, the extended state observer (ESO) is proposed, which is model-independent and can achieve the simultaneous estimation of unmeasured system states and multiple uncertainties (Huang et al, 2021;Yang et al, 2021aYang et al, , 2021bZuo et al, 2021). However, a crucial issue will be encountered in the foregoing ESO-based control methods, that is, when faced with unmodeled dynamics and unknown disturbances, the transient and steady-state behavior of the system cannot be prespecified in advance without recourse to regulating the controller parameters repeatedly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%