2014 Makassar International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (MICEEI) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/miceei.2014.7067331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A leakage detection system on the Water Pipe Network through Support Vector Machine method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used five classifiers, k-nearest neighbors (KNN) [27], radial basis function (RBF)-SVM [22], linear (LIN)-SVM [30], back-propagation neural network (BPNN) [25] and random forest (RF) [23], to achieve the partition-level recognition results for the processed data obtained by the proposed and referenced methods. Considering the overall classification performance, the Monte Carlo method was used to determine the optimal parameters of these classifiers in Table 3.…”
Section: Model Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used five classifiers, k-nearest neighbors (KNN) [27], radial basis function (RBF)-SVM [22], linear (LIN)-SVM [30], back-propagation neural network (BPNN) [25] and random forest (RF) [23], to achieve the partition-level recognition results for the processed data obtained by the proposed and referenced methods. Considering the overall classification performance, the Monte Carlo method was used to determine the optimal parameters of these classifiers in Table 3.…”
Section: Model Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flaws of this method are its lack of interpretability and the time cost of model training. The machine learning approach includes clustering [7], Bayesian classifier [21], support vector machine (SVM) [22], and random forest [23]. It learns uncertain, strictly interpretable and nonlinear relationships between monitoring parameters and burst events [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compression data is obtained from simulation results using EPANET 2.0. To train the system detects the size and location of the leakage data with the pressure analysis obtained from EPANET using the neural network method [16]. A simpler energy efficiency solution provided for monitoring water quality inside pipes based on Internet of Things technology and analyzing the data uploaded online and gives an alert to the remote user, when water quality standards deviate from the predefined set of standard values [17].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that they could locate the bursts with an accuracy of 98.33%. Salam et al [14] investigated an on-line monitoring system to detect leakages in pipe networks. They used a network from Makassar in Indonesia.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%