“…The best performance of the presented iterative classification-based image retrieval framework in [21] based on dataset of ImageCLEF 2005 consisting of 10,000 medical X-ray images of 57 classes (9,000 images as training dataset and 1,000 images as test dataset) was 0.915, 0.88, 0.71, and 0.67 for Pr (20), Pr(Re= Pr), Pr(Re=0.5), and Pr−Re area, respectively. The best performance of the proposed CBIR system in [22] based on a database consisting of 5,000 images of 30 categories was 0.52, 0.53, and 0.50 for Pr(Re=Pr), Pr(Re=0.5), and Pr−Re area, respectively (these values have been approximately calculated from precision-recall curve in [22]). The best performance of the proposed CBIR system in [23] based on a database consisting of 2,785 images of 15 categories was 0.77, 0.78, and 0.76 for Pr(Re=Pr), Pr(Re=0.5), and Pr−Re area, respectively (these values have been approximately calculated from precision-recall curve in [23]).…”