2011
DOI: 10.1109/titb.2011.2151258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Learning-Based Similarity Fusion and Filtering Approach for Biomedical Image Retrieval Using SVM Classification and Relevance Feedback

Abstract: This paper presents a classification-driven biomedical image retrieval framework based on image filtering and similarity fusion by employing supervised learning techniques. In this framework, the probabilistic outputs of a multiclass support vector machine (SVM) classifier as category prediction of query and database images are exploited at first to filter out irrelevant images, thereby reducing the search space for similarity matching. Images are classified at a global level according to their modalities base… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The best performance of the presented iterative classification-based image retrieval framework in [21] based on dataset of ImageCLEF 2005 consisting of 10,000 medical X-ray images of 57 classes (9,000 images as training dataset and 1,000 images as test dataset) was 0.915, 0.88, 0.71, and 0.67 for Pr (20), Pr(Re= Pr), Pr(Re=0.5), and Pr−Re area, respectively. The best performance of the proposed CBIR system in [22] based on a database consisting of 5,000 images of 30 categories was 0.52, 0.53, and 0.50 for Pr(Re=Pr), Pr(Re=0.5), and Pr−Re area, respectively (these values have been approximately calculated from precision-recall curve in [22]). The best performance of the proposed CBIR system in [23] based on a database consisting of 2,785 images of 15 categories was 0.77, 0.78, and 0.76 for Pr(Re=Pr), Pr(Re=0.5), and Pr−Re area, respectively (these values have been approximately calculated from precision-recall curve in [23]).…”
Section: Discussion and Comparison With Other Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The best performance of the presented iterative classification-based image retrieval framework in [21] based on dataset of ImageCLEF 2005 consisting of 10,000 medical X-ray images of 57 classes (9,000 images as training dataset and 1,000 images as test dataset) was 0.915, 0.88, 0.71, and 0.67 for Pr (20), Pr(Re= Pr), Pr(Re=0.5), and Pr−Re area, respectively. The best performance of the proposed CBIR system in [22] based on a database consisting of 5,000 images of 30 categories was 0.52, 0.53, and 0.50 for Pr(Re=Pr), Pr(Re=0.5), and Pr−Re area, respectively (these values have been approximately calculated from precision-recall curve in [22]). The best performance of the proposed CBIR system in [23] based on a database consisting of 2,785 images of 15 categories was 0.77, 0.78, and 0.76 for Pr(Re=Pr), Pr(Re=0.5), and Pr−Re area, respectively (these values have been approximately calculated from precision-recall curve in [23]).…”
Section: Discussion and Comparison With Other Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to involve the users' intention in the retrieval procedure, many algorithms have been presented to integrate relevance feedback (RF) to retrieval algorithm in the literature [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. The query refinement strategies are one of the most commonly used methods which modifies the query image in the RF phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among other classifiers, SVMs have shown a better generalization performance in medical domain compared with other classification techniques. [9][10][11][19][20] …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cai et al [2] have proposed a prototype design which supports an efficient content-based retrieval based on physiological kinetic features and reduces image storage requirements. Rahman et al [20] have proposed a classification-driven biomedical image retrieval framework based on image filtering and similarity fusion by employing supervised learning techniques. Yang et al [32] have proposed a boosting framework for distance metric learning that aims to preserve both visual and semantic similarities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%