2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11628-016-0315-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A learning-oriented decision-making process for real estate brokerage service evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that, due to the constructivist and process-oriented nature of our framework, when correctly adjusted, the procedures followed can work well with any other expert panel (cf. Belton & Stewart, 2002;Ferreira et al, 2017c). Two group meetings, with an average duration of four hours each were carried out, guided by two experienced facilitators, who coordinated the negotiation process between the panel members.…”
Section: Application and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is worth noting that, due to the constructivist and process-oriented nature of our framework, when correctly adjusted, the procedures followed can work well with any other expert panel (cf. Belton & Stewart, 2002;Ferreira et al, 2017c). Two group meetings, with an average duration of four hours each were carried out, guided by two experienced facilitators, who coordinated the negotiation process between the panel members.…”
Section: Application and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although subjective in nature, such maps can be of great use in organizing and structuring complex decision problems, enabling different perspectives to be considered and harmonized based on discussion and exchange of experiences among decision makers (for developments, see Belton & Stewart, 2002;Eden, 2004;Eden & Ackermann, 2004;Montibeller et al, 2008 andF. Ferreira, Spahr, Sunderman, Banaitis, &J.…”
Section: Gbadegesin and Oletubo (2013)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods have the inherent capability and potential to support the subjective evaluation of performance criteria and to make the best decisions even from the most conflicting criteria (Gudienė et al 2014;Mortazavi Ravari et al 2016;Kumar et al 2017;Keshavarz Ghorabaee et al 2018). In the real estate business, MCDM methods are employed in a variety of areas including risk investment (Bispinck 2012;Baležentis et al 2012;Padhi et al 2015;Faraji Sabokbar et al 2016), real estate brokerage service evaluation (Ferreira et al 2017), housing attributes (Thériault et al 2003;Pourahmad et al 2015), quality of life (Sabokbar et al 2016;Kaklauskas et al 2018), security, investor behaviour analysis (Bispinck 2012) and location (Haddad et al 2011). However, there is no literature available on the assessment of innovation capabilities of real estate firms using MCDM Kimberly and Evanisko (1981), Grant (1996), Lev and Zarowin (1999), Young et al (2001), Davidsson and Honig (2003), Smith et al (2005), Wong and He (2005), Freel (2006), Vivares et al (2016) Human capital and innovativeness capability Research and development cooperation capability Lev and Zarowin (1999), Young et al (2001), Davidsson and Honig (2003), Smith et al (2005), Wong and He (2005), Freel (2006), Tan and Nasurdin (2011), Vaccaro et al (2012), Lusch and Nambisan (2015),…”
Section: Applications Of Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods In Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality has become such a buzzword for the improvement of any business for a long time and therefore, one of the most frequently researched topics (Womack et al 2008;Forsythe 2015;Ferreira et al 2017;Osei-Kyei et al 2017). From the service industry perspective, receiving more attention (quality of service) increases customers' satisfaction, subsequently strengthening bonds (loyalty) between them and a company (Nadiri, Gunay 2013), which may lead to them recommending that company to others (Wu, Liang 2009), which ultimately will reflect on profitability.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%