1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0887(199611)12:11<795::aid-cnm22>3.0.co;2-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A least-squares finite element scheme for the RLW equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 1 the time evolution of the invariants I 1 , I 2 and I 3 , and of the error norms L 2 and L 1 , is compared with previous works [8,9,[17][18][19]. It can be noticed that the proposed Petrov-Galerkin FEM formulation achieves superior conservation properties and accuracy: changes in I 1 at t ¼ 20 are below 10 À3 %, while I 2 and I 3 are exact up to the last recorded digit; the maximum error, L 1 -norm, is 0:026 Â 10 À3 while the L 2 -norm is 0:065 Â 10 À3 .…”
Section: Solitary Wave Propagationsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In Table 1 the time evolution of the invariants I 1 , I 2 and I 3 , and of the error norms L 2 and L 1 , is compared with previous works [8,9,[17][18][19]. It can be noticed that the proposed Petrov-Galerkin FEM formulation achieves superior conservation properties and accuracy: changes in I 1 at t ¼ 20 are below 10 À3 %, while I 2 and I 3 are exact up to the last recorded digit; the maximum error, L 1 -norm, is 0:026 Â 10 À3 while the L 2 -norm is 0:065 Â 10 À3 .…”
Section: Solitary Wave Propagationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For comparison with earlier results [8,9,[17][18][19], we take d ¼ l 2 ¼ 1. The numerical domain is x 2 0; 100 ½ with Dx ¼ 0:125 and Dt ¼ 0:1, and therefore Cr ¼ 0:8 and…”
Section: Solitary Wave Propagationmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations