2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1903.06042
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A lending scheme for a system of interconnected banks with probabilistic constraints of failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typical example are default triggered by some stopping time defined as a hitting time. Such an approach has been for instance considered in [14,15,35]. The latter instead considers a default event which is completely inaccessible for the probabilistic reference filtration, so that in order to solve the problem the typical approach is to rely on filtration enlargment techniques, see, e.g., [6,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typical example are default triggered by some stopping time defined as a hitting time. Such an approach has been for instance considered in [14,15,35]. The latter instead considers a default event which is completely inaccessible for the probabilistic reference filtration, so that in order to solve the problem the typical approach is to rely on filtration enlargment techniques, see, e.g., [6,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main contribution of the present paper is to develop a concrete financial setting that models the evolution of a financial entity, controlled by an external supervisor who is willing to lend money in order to maximize a given utility function; see also [11,15,20,35,43] for setting in which a financial supervisor aims at controlling a system of banks of general financial entities. In compete generality, we will assume that the financial entity may fail at some random time that is inaccessible to the reference filtration, which represents the controller knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%