A Lesson in Valuation From Estonia: The Difference Between the Fundamental Value of Equity Under Distributed and Traditional Profit Taxation Systems

Abstract

Corporate value creation and management are one of the key issues for any business enterprise. A gap exists in research into the implications of the distributed profit taxation (DPT) system in Estonia for corporate value creation. Under the Estonian system of corporate taxation, companies need not pay income tax on undistributed earnings, allowing them to postpone income tax liability indeterminately. This theoretical paper compares the relationship between a company’s equity value and taxation of profits under traditional (or classical) (TPT) and DPT systems. A TPT system is a system where the amount of corporate income tax is determined by the profit the company earned during the taxation period. We show that fundamental equity value under a DPT system should be higher vis-à-vis equity value under a TPT system (ceteris paribus). To illustrate this, we use a dividend discount model and values from a hypothetical company. The equity value under DPT is also higher when financial leverage is considered. The results suggest that conventional valuation models and their inputs should be adjusted when valuing Estonian companies. Ignoring these adjustments runs the risk of undervaluing the equity of Estonian companies, as well as the equity of companies operating under similar tax regimes.

Earnings and Firm Value: The Moderating Impact of Large Deferred Taxes and Large Accruals in Indonesia

“…The use of LPDT is similar to Blaylock et al (2012) in measuring LPBTD. Kantšukov and Sander (2018) suggested that distributed profit taxation (DPT) is better (in terms of fundamental equity value) compared to traditional / classical profit taxation (TPT). This study breaks down tax costs into current taxes and deferred taxes, and subsequently deferred taxes are grouped into large deferred taxes (LDT), either positive or negative, and small deferred taxes (SDT).…”

Impact of Tax Effects on Profit Optimisation. Review of International Approaches

“…The dividend distribution system in force in Estonia, Latvia (since 2018) and Georgia (since 2017) allows only part of the profit in the form of dividends to be taxed; retained earnings are not taxed. Taxation of only distributed profits has been shown to increase investment activity in order to minimize the tax burden [15]. Estonia, along with Latvia, has the first two places in the Corporate Tax Rank (International Tax Competitiveness Index) 2019 [16].…”

The Effect of Ifrs Adoption and Law Enforcement on Book Tax Aggressiveness: Evidence From Asean Countries

“…Shackelford and Sevlin (2001) observe that firms face a trade-off between financial and tax reporting aggressiveness. Erickson et al (2004) support these findings by demonstrating that firms are willing to pay higher taxes to report higher income, because under the classical taxation system, the calculation of tax is based on profits (Kantsukov and Sander 2018). However, Kamila and Martani (2017) document that firms are not always confronted with a trade-off between financial reporting aggressiveness and tax reporting aggressiveness.…”