2011
DOI: 10.3368/er.29.1-2.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Levels-of-Evidence Approach for Assessing Cumulative Ecosystem Response to Estuary and River Restoration Programs

Abstract: Large-scale ecological restoration programs are beginning to supplement isolated projects implemented on rivers and tidal waterways. Nevertheless, the effects of estuary and river restoration often continue to be evaluated at local project scales or by integration in an additive manner. Today, we have sufficient scientific understanding to apply knowledge gained from measuring cumulative impacts of anthropogenic stressors on ecosystems to assessment of ecological restoration. Integration of this knowledge has … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To capture the essential elements of restoration, including resilience, we proposed the concept of net ecosystem improvement (NEI) as a framework for prioritizing restoration projects and for evaluating the cumulative effects of projects on broader ecosystem services (Thom et al 2005a;Diefenderfer et al 2011). Sustained net improvement of the ecosystem requires building resilient components of the ecosystem that support one another.…”
Section: Resilience In Restoration Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To capture the essential elements of restoration, including resilience, we proposed the concept of net ecosystem improvement (NEI) as a framework for prioritizing restoration projects and for evaluating the cumulative effects of projects on broader ecosystem services (Thom et al 2005a;Diefenderfer et al 2011). Sustained net improvement of the ecosystem requires building resilient components of the ecosystem that support one another.…”
Section: Resilience In Restoration Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study incorporated two typical reference-site applications used by the programmatic restoration assessment approach for the LCRE (Diefenderfer et al, 2011) where (1) each restoration site was paired with a single reference site to assess restoration targets and monitor change: Vera Slough and Vera Slough reference site, Kandoll Farm and Seal Slough reference site, Crims Island and Gull Island reference site, and the historically breached marsh and reference swamp on Karlson Island; and (2) to broaden understanding of acceptable restoration targets, a group of reference sites was used to evaluate the range of natural conditions in a plant community, in this case Sitka spruce swamps: Seal Slough, Karlson Island, Crooked Creek, and Secret River. Differences among the swamps become evident in the fundamental relationship between WSE and inundated area (Fig.…”
Section: Comparing Restoration and Reference Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical for large rivers globally (Tockner and Stanford, 2002), diking and flow reduction have significantly reduced the shallow-water habitat area available to juvenile salmon (Kukulka and Jay, 2003). Thus, the reconnection of lateral floodplain and estuarine habitat with the main-stem river by breaching dikes and removing or replacing culverts and tide gates is a primary activity of the landscape-scale Columbia Estuary Ecosystem Restoration Program (CEERP) (NMFS, 2008;Diefenderfer et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the framework described by Diefenderfer et al. (, ), we hypothesized that restoring hydrological interconnection would allow for a material exchange process and we investigated how much material would leave the system and whether that material could reach the broader estuary from sites located in tidal freshwater portions of tributary streams and rivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, our study addressed the following question: Does restoring hydrological connection facilitate the export of quantities of endogenously produced POM that could fuel the food web of the broader ecosystem? Using the framework described by Diefenderfer et al (2011Diefenderfer et al ( , 2016, we hypothesized that restoring hydrological interconnection would allow for a material exchange process and we investigated how much material would leave the system and whether that material could reach the broader estuary from sites located in tidal freshwater portions of tributary streams and rivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%