A leverage points perspective on social networks to understand sustainability transformations: evidence from Southern Transylvania

Abstract

Sustainability transformations research increasingly recognizes the importance of local actors and their networks to foster fundamental societal change. Local actors have different types of relations between each other (e.g., sharing material resources, giving advice) through which they jointly intervene in different system characteristics. We conducted social network analyses of 32 non-governmental organizations (NGOs) who drive initiatives to foster sustainability in Southern Transylvania, Romania. In so doing, we applied a leverage points perspective by differentiating between relations according to the system characteristic they address, such as the parameters, feedbacks, design and intent of the system. Additionally, we tested for differences of centrality metrics (i.e., weighted degree, betweenness, eigenvector) from NGOs that conduct different actions (i.e., amplification processes) to increase the impact of their sustainability initiatives. Our results reveal several NGOs that have central positions in their networks for intervening in both shallower (i.e., parameters and feedbacks) and deeper (i.e., design and intent of a system) system characteristics. We also identified NGOs that are only central for intervening in specific system characteristics. In addition, we found that specific groups of amplification processes (i.e., amplifying within and out) are associated with the NGOs’ positions in the parameters, feedbacks, and design networks. We conclude that the leverage points perspective in social network analysis has the potential to identify key actors and shed light on the attributes of local actors for intervening in shallower and deeper system characteristics to foster sustainability transformations.

Leverage points for sustainability transformations: nine guiding questions for sustainability science and practice

“…These papers demonstrate how a leverage points framework can help us to identify the boundaries of a system, who the actors are, what the connections are, and what interventions might look like. Each of the systems being studied can be characterised around leverage points as systems properties; they all have intent/paradigms, design, processes and materials (see Abson et al 2017) that can be unpacked and examined (e.g., Lam et al 2020). These papers also demonstrate that we can take a multitude of disciplinary and interdisciplinary perspectives to understand and unpack these systems.…”

The programme on ecosystem change and society (PECS) – a decade of deepening social-ecological research through a place-based focus

“…These realms are (from shallow to deep) focus on: parameters (mechanistic characteristics typically targeted by policymakers, such as the number of hectares of forest preserved), feedbacks (interactions between elements of a system that drive internal dynamics, such as interactions between people and the natural landscape), design (social structure and institutions that manage feedbacks and parameters), and intent (values and worldviews of actors in the system). For example, SES research in Southern Transylvania, Romania has provided insights on how local actors leverage change to foster sustainability, through different relations and networks across these four realms (Lam et al 2021). At the global-level, the leverage points framework was recently used in the IPBES Global Assessment report, which applied a social -ecological systems lens to identify eight leverage points (priority points for intervention) and five levers of change (strategic actions and priority interventions), which appear to be key to societal transformation (Brondizio et al 2019;Chan et al 2020).…”

Leveraging Governance Performance to Enhance Climate Resilience

“…Here, we apply a systems analysis using graph/network theory for analyzing the governance system. This type of analysis is typically used for social network analysis (e.g., Bodin & Crona, 2009;Lam et al, 2020), and is increasingly applied for studying human-nature relationships (Kluger et al, 2020). Leverage points, in this study, are described as points in the FCM representation of the system (a node with high centrality and medium to low performance) which, upon intervention, will cause systemic and Nodes with increased size in step 3 visualize governance processes with higher centrality and therefore potential leverage points.…”