A lifestyle intervention study targeting individuals with low socioeconomic status of different ethnic origins: important aspects for successful implementation

Abstract

BackgroundEvaluation of the implementation process of trials is important, because the way a study is implemented modifies its outcomes. Furthermore, lessons learned during implementation can inform other researchers on factors that play a role when implementing interventions described in research. This study evaluates the implementation of the MetSLIM study, targeting individuals with low socioeconomic status of different ethnic origins. The MetSLIM study was set up to evaluate the effectiveness of a lifestyle programme on waist circumference and other cardio-metabolic risk factors. The objective of this evaluation was to identify components that were essential for the implementation of the MetSLIM study and to inform other researchers on methodological aspects when working with inadequately reached populations in health research.MethodsIn this evaluation study the experiences of health professionals, study assistants, a community worker and regional research coordinators involved in the MetSLIM study were explored using semi-structured interviews. Questionnaires were used to evaluate participants’ satisfaction with the lifestyle intervention.ResultsOur analyses show that a flexible recruitment protocol eventually leads to recruitment of sufficient participants; that trust in the recruiter is an important factor in the recruitment of individuals with low socioeconomic status of different ethnic origins; and that health professionals will unavoidably shape the form of intervention activities. Furthermore, our evaluation shows that daily practice and research mutually influence each other and that the results of an intervention are a product of this interaction.ConclusionsHealth promotion research would benefit from a perspective that sees intervention activities not as fixed entities but rather as social interaction that can take on numerous forms. Analysing and reporting the implementation process of studies, like in this evaluation, will allow readers to get a detailed view on the appropriateness of the (intended) study design and intervention for the targeted population. Evaluation studies that shed light on the reasons for adaptations, rather than describing them as deviation from the original plan, would point out methodological aspects important for a study’s replication. Furthermore, they would show how various factors can influence the implementation, and therewith initiate a learning cycle for the development of future intervention studies.Trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register NTR3721 (since November 27, 2012).

Primary prevention of overweight and obesity in adolescents: An overview of systematic reviews

“…Other survey data suggest generally higher obesity prevalence among boys than girls, younger than older adolescents, and in socially disadvantaged groups 4,6 . Existing approaches for obesity prevention have not been effective at reaching these adolescents, and it is important to adopt universal public health approaches, including structural policy measures, with targeted interventions when necessary 7–9 …”

Effect of integrating a video intervention on parenting practices and related parental self-efficacy regarding health behaviours within the Feel4Diabetes-study in Belgian primary schoolchildren from vulnerable families: A cluster randomized trial

“…Future research should look for more effective strategies for identifying vulnerable groups. For example, contacting local health professionals, community workers or general practitioners working in low SES neighbourhoods to identify potential participants who might be eligible for participation or to involve them during the intervention [62, 63]. A greater impact on parenting-related factors would be expected when focusing only on a low individual SES population with a high risk for developing T2D.…”

Prevention and treatment of obesity

“…It is not only the effectiveness of CLIs which has been studied, but the implementation process of CLIs in real-world settings has also been investigated [35,53,[70][71][72][73]. These process evaluations have identified implementation barriers in terms of a lack of multidisciplinary collaboration and insufficient skills among primary care professionals, as well as lack of time to optimise coaching [35,72].…”

“…The implementation process of various types of CLI has been evaluated [35,53,67,[70][71][72][73]158]. The results of many studies show too little multidisciplinary collaboration between important stakeholders, and professionals having insufficient skills and time to give participants the best possible guidance [35,72,159,160].…”