2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.matt.2022.04.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A lightweight aramid-based structural composite with ultralow thermal conductivity and high-impact force dissipation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the honeycomb structure also made some contribution to the impact toughness. In comparison to previously reported SSG‐based protective materials, [ 41,58–62 ] the 3D‐KSH with designable aerogel honeycomb had a higher value of specific impact toughness (energy absorption value up to 176 J g −1 at the strain rate of 6300 s −1 ), making it suitable for applying in energy absorbing fields (Figure 4b). Notably, although Clear Flex 75 and SSG demonstrated a comparable contrast ratio of specific impact toughness to that of 3D‐KSH, their response sensitivity (the slope of the fitted curve) was low (sensitivity factor of 1.87 × 10 −4 and 3.28 × 10 −4 for Clear Flex 75 and SSG, respectively), which would be detrimental to the performance of impact resistance when rapid response was required (Figure S25, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the honeycomb structure also made some contribution to the impact toughness. In comparison to previously reported SSG‐based protective materials, [ 41,58–62 ] the 3D‐KSH with designable aerogel honeycomb had a higher value of specific impact toughness (energy absorption value up to 176 J g −1 at the strain rate of 6300 s −1 ), making it suitable for applying in energy absorbing fields (Figure 4b). Notably, although Clear Flex 75 and SSG demonstrated a comparable contrast ratio of specific impact toughness to that of 3D‐KSH, their response sensitivity (the slope of the fitted curve) was low (sensitivity factor of 1.87 × 10 −4 and 3.28 × 10 −4 for Clear Flex 75 and SSG, respectively), which would be detrimental to the performance of impact resistance when rapid response was required (Figure S25, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The slight change of peak positions was due to the formation of hydrogen bonds between SSG and Kevlar nanofiber chains. [ 41 ] In addition, under uniaxial tensile condition, the SSG sandwiching between two slices of 3D‐KAH was gradually stretched into a filament, while did not disengage at the interface of 3D‐KAH and SSG, further demonstrating the SSG had excellent adhesion to Kevlar nanofibers (Figure S16 and Movie S1, Supporting Information). Thus, the SSG had the ability to conform on Kevlar nanofiber in 3D‐KAH due to the viscous fluid at lower strain rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 22,24–30 ] f) Toughness versus density for the cement aerogel and other commercial materials. [ 20,25,31 33 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, some wearable electronic devices may inevitably serve in harsh environments, such as extreme mechanical destruction, low/high temperature, or even ame stress. [26][27][28] Hence, it is practically urgent to develop conductive textiles with extreme mechanical robustness, long-term environmental stability, and even ame retardance, for applications in harsh conditions. However, few studies have reported such strong textiles previously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%